Search results
0% Tomatometer 7 Reviews 19% Audience Score 10,000+ Ratings It's been eight years since Bobby (John Laughlin) barely survived being terrorized and held captive by a group of desert-dwelling ...
- Wes Craven
- New Realm Entertainments
- Robert Houston
- Horror
The Hills Have Eyes Part II Reviews. a film destined to be a footnote in Craven's career - but footnotes can often provide real, demythologising insight into both filmmakers and the...
The Hills Have Eyes Part II is Wes Craven's less than great follow-up to the brutal original. The first film is damn near terrifying in parts. This one is slightly goofy and unbelievable.
Aug 2, 1985 · The Hills Have Eyes Part II: Directed by Wes Craven. With Robert Houston, David Nichols, Virginia Vincent, James Whitworth. A group of bikers, heading to a race, become stranded in the desert and find themselves fighting off a family of inbred cannibals who live off the land.
- (7.4K)
- Horror, Thriller
- Wes Craven
- 1985-08-02
A motocross team on their way to trial a new super-fuel head out across the desert lead by Rachel, who, unbeknownst to the rest of the group, is a survivor of the cannibal clan which menaced the Carter family several years before. Opting to take an ill-advised shortcut, the busload of youngsters drive straight into the path of the remnants of Rachel’s demented cannibal kin - the menacing ...
The Hills Have Eyes Part II received unanimously negative reviews from critics. AllMovie called it "atrocious". Review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes gives the film a score of 0% based on reviews from 7 critics and a rating of 3.00 out of 10.
People also ask
Is the Hills Have Eyes Part 2 a good movie?
When was the Hills Have Eyes Part 2 filmed?
Will there be a Hills Have Eyes 2 (2007)?
Where can I watch the Hills Have Eyes Part 2?
Who are the actors in the Hills Have Eyes Part 2?
How pathetic was the Hills Have Eyes Part 2?
1 (25%) negative. 3 (75%) Showing 4 Critic Reviews. 50. Slant Magazine. Wes Craven’s The Hills Have Eyes Part 2 is a bland, bloodless shambles. Sequel-making of the laziest sort, it’s nothing more than a perfunctory, undisguised cash-grab. Read More. FULL REVIEW. 30. Variety.
