Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. May 11, 2018 · This diverse group was concerned about the amount of power the Constitution would grant the national government, apprehensive about representation at the national level, and disturbed over the lack of safeguards for citizens' rights. Anti-Federalists were a significant presence in most states.

  2. Mar 4, 2020 · Mar 4th, 2020. The Anti- Federalists had a strong distrust of government power. A national government with too much power was, as far as they were concerned, a pathway to government oppression. Just over two hundred and thirty years ago, a convention gathered in Philadelphia to consider improvements to the United States’ first constitution ...

  3. The main arguments under scrutiny were how much control and power should be vested in the singular national government. Antifederalists, as they came to be called, were the voices warning of tyranny and a new monarchy if too much power was vested in a national body.

  4. Apr 22, 2023 · What did the Anti-Federalist Party believe in? The Anti-Federalist Party opposed the creation of a stronger national government and sought to leave the Articles of Confederation, the predecessor of the Constitution, intact. They believed in stronger state governments and more direct democracy.

    • Randal Rust
  5. These opponents, known collectively as Anti-Federalists, did not constitute a political party, but they united in demanding protection for individual rights, and several states made the passing of a bill of rights a condition of their acceptance of the Constitution.

    • OpenStaxCollege
    • 2014
  6. Aug 8, 2019 · I think the key finding here is that the anti-federalists imagined that sooner or later, there would be a one-way drift of power towards the national government. The residual sources to protect the powers and rights of the states were few.

  7. Opponents of ratification were called Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists feared the power of the national government and believed state legislatures, with which they had more contact, could better protect their freedoms.