Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. Top results related to eclipse public license v1.0 error

   • Error in dropdown component using material ui v1.0 beta 26

     Top Answer

     Answered Jan 02, 2018 · 1 votes

     The onChange handler provided to Select is invoked with a target that is enriched with value and name, so you need to pull value from event.target:

     handleChangeDiscountType(event) { const { DiscountTypeData } = this.state; // you're using the text property as the value, but you should probably use its id // still, here's how you'd find the item using the selected item's value const selectedDiscount = DiscountTypeData.filter( discount => discount.text === event.target.value, ); // use a templated literal to specify the endpoint with the selected item's id fetch(`${CREATE_LS_OFFER_TYPE_DD}/${selectedDiscount.id}`) .then(Response => Response.json()) .then(findResponse => { console.log(findResponse); this.setState({ OfferTypeData: findResponse.offerTypes, }); });}

     The reason your code was not working is because onChange is not invoked with a third parameter, so your use of value was setting state to undefined.

     For more information, see the Selects demo.

     Check all answers on Stack Overflow

     1/5

   • Error occurred while enabling [Plugin] v1.0 (is it up to date)

     Top Answer

     Answered Jul 29, 2021 · 1 votes

     Probably you forgot to add entry about your command in plugin.yml. E.g.:

     commands: command_name: description: Your command description usage: /<command> permission: your.command.permission

     More info on Spigot wiki page

     Check all answers on Stack Overflow

     2/5

   • error: cannot access IBase class file for android.hidl.base.V1_0.IBase not found

     Top Answer

     Answered Nov 10, 2017 · 0 votes

     The solution is to add to the Android.mk following line:

     LOCAL_STATIC_JAVA_LIBRARIES := android.hidl.base-V1.0-java-static-

     Also, after that I've got another error: it didn't compile because of proguard. In my case I had to disable it:

     LOCAL_PROGUARD_ENABLED := disabled-

     Otherwise, it is needed to create a proguard config and add all .jars, related to HIDL.

     After that everything works.

     Check all answers on Stack Overflow

     3/5

   • Error querying Consul agent: Get http://127.0.0.1:8500/v1/kv/vault?recurse=: dial tcp 127.0.0.1:8500: connect: connection refused

     Top Answer

     Answered Nov 13, 2019 · 1 votes

     You have to change the http/s address of Consul agent to which you're trying to connect. The default one is http://127.0.0.1:8500 and it doesn't work as you can see in the error.

     To do this, set the following environment variable using the export command:

     export CONSUL_HTTP_ADDR = <http/s_address_to_consul_agent>-

     If connecting via TLS, set also:

     export CONSUL_CACERT = <path_to_cert_file>-

     Alternatively, you can set the above values as the parameters to consul kv export command:

     consul kv export -http-addr=<http/s_address_to_consul_agent> -ca-file=<path_to_cert_file> -

     Check all answers on Stack Overflow

     4/5

   • ERROR: initcaps [Errno 2] iptables v1.6.0: can't initialize iptables table `filter': Table does not exist (do you need to insmod?)

     Top Answer

     Answered Oct 26, 2020 · 1 votes

     Based on advice from @nanofarad, I did this, and it worked.

     I went into the Linode console and launched the instance from there

     Then, I clicked launch console, selected 'Glish', and then entered my username and password on the server, and then ran the sudo ufw allow ssh from inside the server, and that did it. Problem solved!

     Check all answers on Stack Overflow

     5/5

   Show moreShow less

2. eclipse.org › legal › eplfaqEclipse Public License 1.0 (EPL) Frequently Asked Questions

   eclipse.org › legal › eplfaq

   • Cached

   The Eclipse SDK codebase was originally distributed under the CPL. The EPL 1.0 was derived from CPL version 1.0. As a result, much of the information provided in the Common Public License (CPL) Frequently Asked Questions document is relevant to the EPL, as well. The purpose of this FAQ is to highlight the differences.

   • Eclipse Legal FAQ

     Most Eclipse projects use the Eclipse Public License (EPL)...

   • ECA

     Eclipse Contributor Agreement. Version 3.1.0 January 14,...

   • Licenses

     Projects The Eclipse Foundation is home to the Eclipse IDE,...

   • Version 1.0

     1. DEFINITIONS. "Contribution" means: a) in the case of the...

3. fossa.com › blog › open-source-software-licenses-101Open Source Software Licenses 101: The Eclipse Public License

   fossa.com › blog › open-source-software-licenses-101

   • Cached

   • History of The Eclipse Public License
   • Eclipse Public License: Key Provisions
   • 1.0 vs. Epl-2.0
   • Eclipse Public License vs. Other Weak Copyleft Licenses
   • Eclipse Public License: The Bottom Line

   The original version 1.0 of the Eclipse Public License was based on IBM’s Common Public License (CPL). There were two primary differences between the CPL and EPL-1.0. 1. IBM served as the agreement steward for the CPL, while the Eclipse Foundation is the agreement steward for the EPL 2. The EPL removed the following sentence from the CPL that cover...

   See full list on fossa.com

   As a weak copyleft license, the EPL is a middle ground of sorts between permissive options (like the MIT License or Apache License 2.0) and strong copyleft licenses (like GPL v2 and GPL v3.) A core requirement of the EPL — one that’s not part of permissive licenses — is that derivative works of EPL-licensed code must also be licensed under the EPL....

   See full list on fossa.com

   As mentioned, there are four major differences between the original version of the Eclipse Public License (EPL-1.0) and the current EPL-2.0. 1. In contrast to the original, the EPL-2.0 is suitable for scripting languages such as JavaScript, PHP, Python, and Ruby, among others. This is because the EPL-2.0 both defines source code and requires source...

   See full list on fossa.com

   As mentioned, the Eclipse Public License has a lot in common with other popular weak copyleft licenses like the LGPL and Mozilla Public License 2.0, but there are a handful of notable differences.

   See full list on fossa.com

   As a weak copyleft license, the EPL fills a gap between permissive and strong copyleft licenses. Although the EPL doesn’t rival the MIT or Apache 2.0 Licenses in popularity, several well-known projects are licensed under it. These include: 1. Eclipse’s Jetty Project 2. Eclipse’s Golo Language 3. Clojure (licensed under EPL-1.0) 4. AT&T’s Software T...

   See full list on fossa.com

4. People also ask

   What is Eclipse Public License (EPL)?

   • The Eclipse Public License (EPL) is a weak copyleft open source license maintained by the Eclipse Foundation. There are two versions of the EPL — the original EPL-1.0, which was released in 2004, and the EPL-2.0, which was published in 2017.

   Open Source Software Licenses 101: The Eclipse Public License

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-eclipse-public-license/

   See all results for this question

   Should I relicense the Eclipse Public License v2.0 with a secondary license?

   • If your project is currently using a dual licensing scheme involving the Eclipse Public License v1.0 and the Eclipse Distribution License v1.0 (which is BSD 3 Clause), you should consider relicensing to the Eclipse Public License v2.0 with a Secondary License in order to retain the copyleft provisions of the EPL.

   EPL-2.0 FAQ | The Eclipse Foundation

   www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php

   See all results for this question

   Is the Eclipse Public License deprecated?

   • The EPL-1.0 has been deprecated (and the Eclipse Foundation recommends OSS contributors consider switching to 2.0), so we’ll focus primarily on version 2.0 in this blog. (Assume all references to the Eclipse Public License are about the EPL-2.0 unless otherwise noted.)

   Open Source Software Licenses 101: The Eclipse Public License

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-eclipse-public-license/

   See all results for this question

   How do I know if my Eclipse project is dual-licensed?

   • For Eclipse projects which are dual-licensed, your file headers state that the code is being made available under two licenses. For example: "This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0 and Eclipse Distribution License v. 1.0 which accompanies this distribution."

   Eclipse Public License 1.0 (EPL) Frequently Asked Questions

   eclipse.org/legal/eplfaq.php

   See all results for this question

5. stackoverflow.com › questions › 21183425Eclipse Public License v1.0 - Stack Overflow

   stackoverflow.com › questions › 21183425

   • Cached

   Jun 14, 2014 · 41 1 4. 1 Answer. Sorted by: 2. Read Paragraph 4 in the official licence text. You may use it for commercial products, but it must not create any liability on other (previous open source) contributors. In particular, you're responsible on your own if any problems occur. answered Jan 17, 2014 at 10:31. Cedric Reichenbach. 9,110 7 55 90.

6. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Eclipse_Public_LicenseEclipse Public License - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Eclipse_Public_License

   • Cached

   The Eclipse Foundation advises that version 1.0 is deprecated and that projects should migrate to version 2.0. Relicensing is a straightforward matter and does not require the consent of all contributors, past and present.

   • Latest version: 2.0
   • SPDX identifier: EPL-2.0, EPL-1.0

   • Published: 24 August 2017
   • Author: Eclipse Foundation

7. www.mend.io › blog › top-10-eclipse-public-licenseTop 10 Eclipse Public License Questions Answered | Mend

   www.mend.io › blog › top-10-eclipse-public-license

   • Cached

   1. What are the terms and conditions of the Eclipse Public License? 2. Is it considered a copyleft license? 3. What is the difference between the Eclipse Public License and IBM’s Common Public License (CPL)? 4. What is the difference between the Eclipse Public License and the GNU GPL? 5. Is Eclipse Public License compatible with the GNU GPL? 6.

8. www.eclipse.org › legal › epl-2EPL-2.0 FAQ | The Eclipse Foundation

   www.eclipse.org › legal › epl-2

   • Cached

   If your project is currently using a dual licensing scheme involving the Eclipse Public License v1.0 and the Eclipse Distribution License v1.0 (which is BSD 3 Clause), you should consider relicensing to the Eclipse Public License v2.0 with a Secondary License in order to retain the copyleft provisions of the EPL.