Search results
The Karlgren–Li reconstruction of Middle Chinese was a representation of the sounds of Middle Chinese devised by Bernhard Karlgren and revised by Li Fang-Kuei in 1971, remedying a number of minor defects.
Apr 25, 2024 · Last updated April 25, 2024 • 6 min read From Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. The Karlgren–Li reconstruction of Middle Chinese was a representation of the sounds of Middle Chinese devised by Bernhard Karlgren and revised by Li Fang-Kuei in 1971, remedying a number of minor defects.
Karlgren was the first to attempt a reconstruction of the sounds of Middle Chinese, comparing its categories with modern varieties of Chinese and the Sino-Xenic pronunciations used in the reading traditions of neighbouring countries. Several other scholars have produced their own reconstructions using similar methods.
Sep 13, 2016 · With the aid of this material, and some traditional phonological works, he was able to reconstruct what he himself called Ancient Chinese (now called Middle Chinese), the national language spoken by educated Chinese at the end of the Sui and beginning of the Tang dynasty (around 600 A.D.).
- Göran Malmqvist
- luoduobi@gmail.com
- 2016
In his Études sur la phonologie chinoise (1915–1926), Karlgren produced the first complete reconstruction of Middle Chinese (which he called "Ancient Chinese"). He presented his system as a narrow transcription of the sounds of the standard language of the Tang dynasty.
In 1941 Chao criticized Karlgren's Middle Chi- nese reconstruction from this point of view and, introduced the notion of universal distinctive features, one of the foundation stones of the new school of gen- erative phonology that emerged in the late fifties and is now the dominant trend in theoretical linguistics.
People also ask
What is the Karlgren-Li reconstruction of Middle Chinese?
What is Karlgren's contribution to Chinese linguistics?
How did Karlgren derived the four divisions of Middle Chinese finals?
Why did Li change Karlgren's system?
How to reconstruct Old Chinese (1954) 21. If we accepet Maspero’s hypothesis [of a diphthongization], Karlgren’s distinction between -w- and -u-, based on the rhymes, might simply be a distinction between a labial phoneme and a labial feature. Sino-Vietnamese offers an argument.
