Search results
- Unlike his predecessors such as Volpicelli and Schaank, who tried to reconstruct "Ancient Chi- nese" by using only the rhyme tables found at the front of the Kangxi J,1 K dictionary, Karlgren considered Middle Chinese to be the language reflected in the categories of Qieyun and reconstructed it with all the data available to him at the time.
People also ask
What is the Karlgren-Li reconstruction of Middle Chinese?
What is Karlgren's contribution to Chinese linguistics?
What did Karlgren teach his students?
How did Karlgren derived the four divisions of Middle Chinese finals?
The Karlgren–Li reconstruction of Middle Chinese was a representation of the sounds of Middle Chinese devised by Bernhard Karlgren and revised by Li Fang-Kuei in 1971, remedying a number of minor defects.
Karlgren was the first to attempt a reconstruction of the sounds of Middle Chinese, comparing its categories with modern varieties of Chinese and the Sino-Xenic pronunciations used in the reading traditions of neighbouring countries. Several other scholars have produced their own reconstructions using similar methods.
The first complete reconstruction of Old Chinese was produced by the Swedish linguist Bernhard Karlgren in a dictionary of Middle and Old Chinese, the Grammata Serica (1940), revised in 1957 as the Grammata Serica Recensa (GSR).
Sep 13, 2016 · 215 Accesses. Explore all metrics. The name Bernhard Karlgren (Gao Benhan) is well-known to all Chinese who take an interest in the history of their own language. I shall here dwell on Bernhard Karlgren, the man behind the scholar. I first met Bernhard Karlgren in the spring of 1946.
- Göran Malmqvist
- luoduobi@gmail.com
- 2016
In 1941 Chao criticized Karlgren's Middle Chi- nese reconstruction from this point of view and, introduced the notion of universal distinctive features, one of the foundation stones of the new school of gen- erative phonology that emerged in the late fifties and is now the dominant trend in theoretical linguistics.
Karlgren's Analytic Dictionary of Chinese and Sino-Japanese, published in 1923,1 includes not only Middle Chinese reconstructions for several thousand characters, but also a sketch of Middle Chinese phonology as Karlgren saw it and an explanation of how he arrived at his results.
Middle Chinese: Early Middle Chinese, with Qjeyun as its main source of evidence, was based on the educated speech of Luoyang and Nan-king during the late Nanbeichao period; Late Middle Chinese, on the other hand, represented the dialect of Chang'an during the Tang dy-nasty and was reflected in early rhyme tables. It is the classification
