Search results
MOORE v. TEXAS. No. 15–797. Argued November 29, 2016—Decided March 28, 2017. Petitioner Moore was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for fatally shooting a store clerk during a botched robbery that occurred when Moore was 20 years old. A state habeas court subse-quently determined that, under Atkins v.
- 206KB
- 37
Moore v. Texas, 137 S. Ct. 1039 (2017), is a United States Supreme Court decision about the death penalty and intellectual disability. The court held that contemporary clinical standards determine what an intellectual disability is, and held that even milder forms of intellectual disability may bar a person from being sentenced to death due to ...
Results. On March 28, 2017, in a 5-3 decision, the Supreme Court found that Texas erred in using a decades-old lay interpretation of intellectual disability to determine whether defendants faced the death penalty. Instead, the court held that in determining eligibility for the death penalty, courts must rely upon modern scientific clinical ...
Nov 29, 2016 · Texas - SCOTUSblog. Moore v. Texas. Holding: By rejecting the habeas court's application of current medical diagnostic standards and by following the standard under Ex parte Briseno, including the nonclinical Briseno factors, the decision of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals does not comport with the Eighth Amendment and Supreme Court ...
DateProceedings And Orders ( Key To Color ...Dec 15 2015Jan 19 2016Jan 19 2016Jan 19 2016Feb 21, 2023 · Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 9, 2023. Jan 09 2023. Brief of respondent Texas in opposition filed. Jan 23 2023. Reply of petitioner Slade Moore filed. (Distributed) Jan 25 2023. DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023. Feb 21 2023.
Mar 29, 2017 · The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Moore v. Texas, which concerns whether Texas' criteria for determining if an intellectually disabled person can be sentenced to death. In 2002, the Supreme Court ruled that executing a "mentally retarded" person violated the Constitution's Eighth Amendment ban against cruel and unusual punishment.
Mar 28, 2017 · Texas, 15-797. Read Moore v. Texas, 15-797 READ. In a petition for habeas corpus relief from death sentence for fatally shooting a store clerk during a botched robbery that occurred when petitioner was 20 years old, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) decision overturning the habeas court's grant of petition -- which found that petitioner ...
