Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Jan 30, 2024 · About This FAQ. This is the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2.0 FAQ. It aims to answer the most common questions people have about using and distributing code under the MPL. Please note that, while this FAQ is intended to be accurate and helpful, it is not the license, and may not cover important issues that affect you and your specific ...

  2. Mozilla Public License 2.0 (MPL-2.0) Open Source. OSI-Approved. CopyLeft. Summary. Terms. Full Text. MPL is a copyleft license that is easy to comply with. You must make the source code for any of your changes available under MPL, but you can combine the MPL software with proprietary code, as long as you keep the MPL code in separate files.

  3. People also ask

  4. This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this file, You can obtain one at https://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/ . However, you don't need to put the notice in each file if it is "not possible or desirable" as per the license ( Exhibit A ):

  5. Mozilla Public License; Author: Mozilla Foundation: Latest version: 2.0: Publisher: Mozilla Foundation: Published: January 3, 2012: SPDX identifier: MPL-2.0 MPL-1.1 MPL-1.0 (see list for more) Debian FSG compatible: Yes: FSF approved: Yes: OSI approved: Yes: GPL compatible: 2.0 and later: Yes (by default, unless marked as "Incompatible With ...

  6. Apr 5, 2021 · Over a decade later, in 2010, Mozilla Public License 2.0 made its debut, and has remained the MPL of choice ever since. The MPL 2.0 is neither a permissive license like the MIT License (which allows for use of the licensed code with very few restrictions) nor a strong copyleft license like the GPL v2 License (which places numerous restrictions ...

  1. People also search for