Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. www.mozilla.org › en-US › MPLMozilla Public Licence — Mozilla

   www.mozilla.org › en-US › MPL

   • Cached

   The current version of the license is MPL 2.0 (html | plain text). If you want to use or distribute code licensed under the MPL 2.0 and have questions about it, you may want to read the FAQ. MPL 2.0 Revision Process. The release of MPL 2.0 was the result of a two year process that revised MPL 1.1.

   • Version 2.0

     1.12. “Secondary License” means either the GNU General...

     MPL 2.0 FAQ

     · Changes From MPL 1.1

     · Mpl-In-Gpl Developer Guidelines

     · Permissive-Code-Into-Mpl Developer Guidelines

     · Revision Process and Changes FAQ

   • MPL 1.1

     the licenses granted in this Section 2.1 and are effective...

     Mozilla Public License Version 1.1

     · MPL 1.1 FAQ

   • Mozilla Licensing Policies

     Mozilla Monitor. See if your email has appeared in a...

   • Appropriate Header Text

     Mozilla License Headers This page gives copy-and-pasteable...

   • Historical Documents

     Mozilla Public License, version 1.1 This is the Mozilla...

2. www.mozilla.org › en-US › MPLMPL 2.0 FAQ — Mozilla

   www.mozilla.org › en-US › MPL

   • Cached

   Jan 30, 2024 · If you see any errors in this FAQ, or have suggestions for further questions, please email licensing@mozilla.org. The MPL version 1.1 FAQ is still available here but should not be used except as a reference for that license. Last updated on January 30th, 2024. About MPL Q1: What is the Mozilla Public License? The MPL is a simple copyleft ...

3. People also ask

   What is the Mozilla Public License?

   • Mozilla is the custodian of the Mozilla Public License ("MPL"), an open source / free software license. The current version of the license is MPL 2.0 ( html | plain text ). If you want to use or distribute code licensed under the MPL 2.0 and have questions about it, you may want to read the FAQ.

   Mozilla Public Licence — Mozilla

   www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/

   See all results for this question

   What is the difference between MPL & Mozilla Public License?

   • MPL 2.0 works particularly well for programs that can use proprietary plug-ins (like some plug-ins to the Firefox browser). Mozilla Public License 2.0 contains an express patent license, but also some terms to clarify the scope of the license. It contains a disclaimer of implied licenses and also a strong defensive termination provision.

   Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-mozilla-public-license-2-0/

   See all results for this question

   Does Mozilla have an open source license?

   • Open source software contributors, however, may also know Mozilla for its commitment to keeping the internet a free and public resource, a mission that matches the ethos of OSS development. It’s therefore no surprise that the Mozilla Foundation has created its own open source license, the Mozilla Public License.

   Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-mozilla-public-license-2-0/

   See all results for this question

   What happened to MPL 2.0?

   • The release of MPL 2.0 was the result of a two year process that revised MPL 1.1. A Revision FAQ documents this process, and explains the most significant changes made. Various historical documents relating to the Mozilla and Netscape Public Licenses are available, including deprecated versions of the license such as MPL 1.1.

   Mozilla Public Licence — Mozilla

   www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/

   See all results for this question

4. fossa.com › blog › open-source-software-licenses-101Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com › blog › open-source-software-licenses-101

   • Cached

   Users of MPL 2.0-licensed code may: Use the code in commercial applications. MPL’d code can be included in software that’s sold commercially. Change the code. Authors can alter or modify the licensed code. Distribute the code. An individual or company can make their reworked version (s) of the code available to others. Use patent claims.

5. opensource.stackexchange.com › questions › 8831licensing - Pros and Cons of using MPL-2.0 license? - Open ...

   opensource.stackexchange.com › questions › 8831

   • Cached

   The MPL license is a copyleft license, which means that in principle people are not allowed to distribute code that is under the MPL-2.0 license under different terms. The GPL licenses (including LGPL and AGPL) require that the entire application is distributed under the terms of the GPL license.

6. www.fsf.org › blogs › licensingThe Mozilla Public License version 2.0 is out—and GPL ...

   www.fsf.org › blogs › licensing

   • Cached

   Jan 5, 2012 · Earlier this week, the Mozilla Foundation published the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2.0. This is a major update to their flagship license, which covers most of the Foundation's own free software projects, as well as others'. This release caps off a two-year update process.

7. wiki.mozilla.org › MPL_UpgradeMPL Upgrade - MozillaWiki

   wiki.mozilla.org › MPL_Upgrade

   • Cached

   MPL 2 Upgrade. Introduction. Mozilla has now completed a 21-month process to revise the Mozilla Public License (MPL), the licence it has used for most new code since the original release of the source code in 1998.