Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. In June 2002, Andrea De Cruz filed a negligence suit against Slim 10, Yuzhitang Health Products, Health Biz Pte Ltd, Semon Liu, TV Media and fellow local actor Rayson Tan. Rayson Tan was the director of TV Media and the husband of Chen Li Ping. He had allegedly sold the Slim 10 pills to Andrea De Cruz personally.

  2. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Rayson_TanRayson Tan - Wikipedia

    Slim 10 saga. In 2003, Tan was sued by fellow actress Andrea De Cruz in the Slim 10 pills saga. De Cruz began her court battle against the importers and distributors of diet pills that she says nearly caused her to die of liver failure.

  3. People also ask

  4. She had purchased Slim 10 pills from actor and colleague Rayson Tan.17 De Cruz suffered liver failure and was hospitalised in April 2002.18 She underwent a successful 12-hour liver transplant after her then fiancé (now husband), Pierre Png, donated part of his liver to her.

  5. Did a double take when I saw this...methinks the comms team at MOH must be too young to remember Slim 10, and whoever approved having Chen Liping and Rayson Tan be the faces of a national health campaign also have short memories...or definitely believe in second chances.

  6. In 2002, De Cruz was a victim of the Slim 10 pills scandal and suffered from liver failure as a result. Png, who was her boyfriend at that time, donated part of his liver. She filed a lawsuit against various distributors of Slim 10 pills and fellow actor Rayson Tan.

  7. Oct 3, 2003 · On 1 June 2001, the second defendant offered Peter Boo a full-time job as its Vice President. The third defendant was its President. He chose the name Slim 10 for the slimming product. Tan Eng Kiat divested himself of all his shares in February 2002 and 1% of the shares in the second defendant was given to Peter Boo.

  8. The fifth defendant, Rayson Tan (“Rayson”), was Andrea’s colleague who supplied her with Slim 10. Andrea claimed in negligence against Health Biz, Semon and TV Media, and sued Rayson for breach of contract. Andrea’s case. 3 For conciseness, this judgment will only set out Andrea’s version of events in full.

  1. People also search for