Dana Andrews
Tom Garrett
Search results
People also ask
Who directed beyond a reasonable doubt?
Who are the actors in beyond a reasonable doubt?
Who died in beyond a reasonable doubt?
Was there an execution in beyond a reasonable doubt?
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt is a 1956 American film noir legal drama directed by Fritz Lang and written by Douglas Morrow. The film stars Dana Andrews, Joan Fontaine, Sidney Blackmer, and Arthur Franz. It was Lang's second film for producer Bert E. Friedlob, and the last American film he directed.
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: Directed by Fritz Lang. With Dana Andrews, Joan Fontaine, Sidney Blackmer, Arthur Franz. A novelist aided by his future father-in-law conspires to frame himself for the murder of a burlesque dancer as part of an effort to ban capital punishment.
- (5.9K)
- Crime, Drama, Film-Noir
- Fritz Lang
- 1956-11
Novelist Tom Garrett (Dana Andrews) and publisher Austin Spencer (Sidney Blackmer) intend to show how lawyer Roy Thompson (Philip Bourneuf) has been using circumstantial evidence in capital...
- (57)
- Dana Andrews
- Fritz Lang
- Mystery & Thriller
Lawyer Wilson (Shepperd Strudwick) brings news to Garrett (Dana Andrews) that the guy helping him pose as a murder suspect has died, fianceè Susan (Joan Fontaine) helping in aftermath, in Beyond A Reasonable Doubt, 1956.
- Fritz Lang, Maxwell Henry
- Dana Andrews
Summaries. A novelist aided by his future father-in-law conspires to frame himself for the murder of a burlesque dancer as part of an effort to ban capital punishment. Tom Garrett's a reporter on leave from his job. As Tom's having difficulty writing the book, his boss, publisher Austin Spencer, suggests he write a non-fiction book on capital ...
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt (1956) Based on real-life events, Black Fury brings viewers deep into Depression hard times…and into the heart of Joe Radek, a simple, hardworking coal miner used. 163 IMDb 6.9 1 h 20 min 1956. X-Ray 13+. Suspense · Drama · Dark · Outlandish.
Fritz Lang. Director. A newspaper publisher, wanting to prove a point about the insufficiency of circumstantial evidence, talks his possible son-in-law Tom into a hoax in an attempt to expose ineptitude of the city's hard-line district attorney. The plan is to have Tom plant clues leading to his arrest for killing a female nightclub dancer.
