Search results
People also ask
Is Max Stirner a psychological egoist?
Is Stirnerian egoism a bad thing?
Is Stirner a nihilism egoist?
Is Stirnerian anarchism a psychological egoist?
Egoist anarchism or anarcho-egoism, often shortened as simply egoism, is a school of anarchist thought that originated in the philosophy of Max Stirner, a 19th-century philosopher whose "name appears with familiar regularity in historically orientated surveys of anarchist thought as one of the earliest and best known exponents of individualist ...
Jun 27, 2002 · Confronted with the conflict between egoism and “society”, Stirner is not prompted to re-examine his commitment to, or understanding of, self-rule, but instead confidently denies the legitimacy of those conventional institutions and practices.
The Unique and Its Property. The Ego and Its Own ( German: Der Einzige und sein Eigentum ), also known as The Unique and Its Property [1] [2] [3] is an 1844 work by German philosopher Max Stirner. It presents a post-Hegelian critique of Christianity and traditional morality on one hand; and on the other, humanism, utilitarianism, liberalism ...
- Max Stirner
- 1844
Union of egoists. Johann Kaspar Schmidt (25 October 1806 – 26 June 1856), known professionally as Max Stirner, was a German post-Hegelian philosopher, dealing mainly with the Hegelian notion of social alienation and self-consciousness. [3]
Max Stirner's Egoism and Nihilism. A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of San Diego State University in Partial Fulfilment of Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Philosophy. by. Larry Alan Schiereck. August, 1981, revised 1996 and 2015.
- 283KB
- 52
Some commentators on Max Stirner have wanted to label him as a psychological egoist.1 After all, his advocacy of autonomy and self-assertion would appear to gain powerful support from a theory which tells us that human beings do, as a matter of fact, pursue only their own self-interest.
Stirner’s departure from Hegel we see an evolution of his own unique contribution to philosophy and social criticism. Stirner didn’t just regurgitate Hegel, he was using Hegelianism as a springboard from which to launch his own dialectical assault against modernity.
