Search results
Sep 18, 2014 · September 18, 2014. The Successes and Failure of John Quincy Adams. John O. McGinnis. The public career of John Quincy Adams poses this paradox: he was the greatest ever Secretary of State but only a mediocre President. As Secretary of State, he concluded the Adams-Onis treaty with Spain and the 1818 convention with Great Britain.
John Quincy Adams: Impact and Legacy. By Margaret A. Hogan. Although a great secretary of state and a man eminently qualified for executive office, John Quincy Adams was hopelessly weakened in his leadership potential as a result of the election of 1824. Most importantly, Adams failed as a President principally because he was a poor politician ...
Richard John of the University of Chicago writes, “John Quincy Adams always regarded his presidency as a failure, and few historians have disagreed .” Adams’ first decision as...
- cjenkinson@governing.com
- Editor-At-Large
Oct 27, 2009 · John Quincy Adams (1767-1848) served as the 6th U.S. president, from 1825 to 1829. He was the son of former president John Adams, a Founding Father. Quincy Adams was outspoken in his...
May 27, 2024 · John Quincy Adams, sixth president of the United States (1825–29) and son of President John Adams. In his prepresidential years he was one of America’s greatest diplomats (formulating, among other things, what came to be called the Monroe Doctrine), and later as a congressman he fought the expansion of slavery.
- Samuel Flagg Bemis
John Quincy Adams was definitely qualified to be a president, but many of his plans for the Union were never accepted and some of his arguments were contrary to the political beliefs of that time, and the trends of increased partisan views and voter interest.
People also ask
Why did John Quincy Adams fail?
Was John Quincy Adams a disappointment?
Why was John Quincy Adams not admired?
How did John Quincy Adams change America?
Reared for public service, John Quincy Adams became one of the nation's preeminent secretaries of state but proved the wrong man for the presidency. Aloof, stubborn, and ferociously independent, he failed to develop the support he needed in Washington, even among his own party.