Search results
- The primary change is simplification. For example, rather than exactly specifying the amount of time source code must be available, the source code must simply be made available when the executable is made available. License headers have been made shorter, and notification requirements have been simplified.
www.mozilla.org › MPL › 2
People also ask
What happened to MPL 2.0?
What is MPL 2.0 & why should I use it?
What is the current version of MPL?
Can I use a later version of MPL?
Jan 30, 2024 · About This FAQ. This is the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2.0 FAQ. It aims to answer the most common questions people have about using and distributing code under the MPL. Please note that, while this FAQ is intended to be accurate and helpful, it is not the license, and may not cover important issues that affect you and your specific ...
The current version of the license is MPL 2.0 (html | plain text). If you want to use or distribute code licensed under the MPL 2.0 and have questions about it, you may want to read the FAQ. MPL 2.0 Revision Process. The release of MPL 2.0 was the result of a two year process that revised MPL 1.1.
What has changed between MPL 1.1 and MPL 2.0? The primary change is simplification. For example, rather than exactly specifying the amount of time source code must be available, the source code must simply be made available when the executable is made available.
The GPL licenses (including LGPL and AGPL) require that the entire application is distributed under the terms of the GPL license. In principle, this is incompatible with the MPL license, but the MPL-2.0 license has a special exception for allowing the code to be distributed under the terms of the GPL licenses.
Aug 25, 2023 · Previously, Terraform operated under the MPL 2.0 License. However, on August 10th, 2023, Terraform made an announcement that it was updating its license from MPL 2.0 to the Business Source License. What is MPL 2.0? MPL stands for Mozilla Public License, and version 2.0 (MPL 2.0) is a type of open-source software license.
- Aman Pathak
Over a decade later, in 2010, Mozilla Public License 2.0 made its debut, and has remained the MPL of choice ever since. The MPL 2.0 is neither a permissive license like the MIT License (which allows for use of the licensed code with very few restrictions) nor a strong copyleft license like the GPL v2 License (which places numerous restrictions ...
Therefore, in early 2010, after more than a decade without modification, an open process for creating version 2.0 of the MPL began. Over the next 21 months, the MPL was not only changed to make the license clearer and easier to apply, but also to achieve compatibility with the GPL and Apache licenses.
