Search results
Apr 19, 2021 · He dislocated both hip joints with bilateral fractures of the pelvis, which were caused by the head of the femur on each side being driven through the acetabula of the pelvis. As a result of his injuries, Mr Bolam took legal action and sued the hospital management for damages.
Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583. TORT – NEGLIGENCE – STANDARD OF CARE FOR MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS - THE BOLAM TEST. Facts. The defendant was the body who employed a doctor who had not given a mentally-ill patient (the claimant) muscle-relaxant drugs nor restrained them prior to giving them electro-convulsive therapy.
People also ask
Who was Mr Bolam & what did he do?
What happened in Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee?
What happened to Mr Bolam?
Why did Mr Bolam sue the hospital?
During this second course of ECT, Mr Bolam sustained severe physical injuries as a result of the induced seizure. He dislocated both hip joints with bilateral fractures of the pelvis, which were caused by the head of the femur on each side being driven through the acetabula of the pelvis.
Sep 3, 2020 · Mr Bolam agreed to undergo electroconvulsive therapy to treat his mental illness but sued in negligence when he suffered injury. He complained that he should have been given relaxants and restrained to reduce the risk of physical injury, and also that he should have been warned of the risks.
- Emma Cave, Caterina Milo
- 2020
Facts. Mr Bolam was a voluntary patient at Friern Hospital, a mental health institution run by the Friern Hospital Management Committee. He agreed to undergo electro-convulsive therapy. He was not given any muscle relaxant, and his body was not restrained during the procedure.
Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957) is a landmark case in negligence law in England. John Bolam suffered from depression. He was advised by the consultants treating him that he should have electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).
Aug 20, 2020 · Aug 20. Written By Tony Elliott. The Bolam Test is a means of assessing clinical negligence in Court. It was introduced in the wake of a landmark case in 1957, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee, and it is used to define the minimum standard of care that a doctor must provide in order not to be found guilty of negligence.
