Ad
related to: What is the American way of war?Browse & Discover Thousands of History Book Titles, for Less.
Search results
People also ask
What is the American way of war?
How can American military and political leaders move toward a way of war?
Do Americans have a way of war?
What is a way of war?
Jun 30, 2020 · The American Way of War in the Twenty-First Century: Three Inherent Challenges - Modern War Institute. Shmuel Shmuel | 06.30.20. The reality of American military power has long been that the United States must project its forces into the enemy’s territory.
Nov 17, 2011 · Rather, the American way of war is twofold: one is a tactical “way of battle” involving a style of warfare where distinct American attributes define the use of force; the other is a strategic “way of war,” attuned to the whims of a four year political system, a process not always conducive to turning tactical victories into strategic ...
- Toward an American Way of War
- FOREWORD
- SUMMARY
- A Way of War Uniquely American?
- A Way of Battle.
- New American Way of War?
- Whose American Way of War?
- Toward a Way of War.
- TOWARD AN AMERICAN WAY OF WAR
- Whose American Way of War?
Antulio J. Echevarria Dr. SSI Follow this and additional works at: https://press.armywarcollege.edu/monographs
The American way of war has been much written about over the years. That literature is remarkable for its explicit and implicit consensus regarding the overriding characteristics of the American approach to warfare--aggressive, direct, and focused on achieving decisive victory. A way of war implies thinking about conflict holistically, from prewar ...
Understanding of the American approach to warfare begins with historian Russell Weigley’s classic work, The American Way of War. He concluded that the American style of waging war centered primarily on the idea of achieving a crushing military victory over an opponent. Americans—not unlike many of their European counterparts—considered war an alter...
Much of what Weigley said about the American way of war would apply to the German, French, or British methods of warfare as well. Yet, the picture he presents is incomplete. Hence, one would do well to consider Max Boot’s Savage Wars of Peace, which contends that Americans actually practiced another way of war with regard to history’s “small wars”—...
While these two interpretations approach the American tradition of warfare from different perspectives, they agree in one very critical respect: the American way of war tends to shy away from thinking about the complicated process of turning military triumphs, whether on the scale of major campaigns or small-unit actions, into strategic successes. ...
growing amount of defense literature refers to a so-called new style of American warfare that emphasizes “precision firepower, special forces, psychological operations, and jointness,” rather than overwhelming force. The characteristics bear a conspicuous resemblance to the qualities of “speed, jointness, knowledge, and precision” that underpin the...
OSD recently took unqualified possession of the emerging American way of war, and began supplanting the traditional grammar of war with a new one. However, this new grammar— which focuses on achieving rapid military victories—was equipped only to win battles, not wars. Hence, the successful accomplishment of the administration’s goal of building a ...
To move toward a genuine way of war, American military and political leaders must address two key problems. First, they must better define the respective roles and responsibilities of the logic and grammar of war, and, in the process, take steps that will diminish the bifurcation in American strategic thinking. Second, political and military leader...
Serious inquiry into the American approach to waging war began in the early 1970s with the publication of Russell Weigley’s The American Way of War.1 Examining how war was thought about and practiced by key U.S. military and political figures from George Washington to Robert McNamara, Weigley concluded that, except in the early days of the nation’s...
Interestingly, while the debate appeared caustic at times, soldiers, policymakers, and academics actually agreed on more than they realized. All maintained, for instance, that military victory on at least some scale was a prerequisite for strategic success. They also saw war in general, and the military tool in particular, as an imperfect means for...
- Antulio J. Echevarria
- 2004
Oct 26, 2011 · The American Way of War. Five books that examine national security and the technology of death. Wednesday, October 26, 2011 6 min read By: Victor Davis Hanson.
The American Way of War is a sweeping and magisterial survey of how Americans have gone about the business of making war. It is learned and. authoritative, provocative and compelling. It reads without effort. It brings. together the diverse strands of American military experience and makes a cohesive whole that instructs, reasons, and questions.
The traditional American way of war is to tolerate situations until the security of our nation is genuinely at risk, then to crush the enemy with overwhelming force. We mobilize the American militia from farms and streetcorners and go kill the Kaiser, Hitler, or whomever. This American way of war is clear, clean, and moral.
Oct 24, 2017 · Grant, Sherman, And The American Way Of War. Russell Weigley, one of America’s leading military historians in the twentieth century, used Sherman’s 1864 scorched-earth March to the Sea that made “Georgia howl,” as an example of the American way of war. While there is some truth in Weigley’s description, he missed another aspect of the ...
