Search results
Human Cancer: Known Causes and Prevention by Organ Site This poster presents carcinogenic agents and cancer-preventive interventions by organ site READ MORE
What was the scientific basis of the IARC evaluations? The pesticides tetrachlorvinphos and parathion were classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) based on convincing evidence that these agents cause cancer in laboratory animals. For the insecticide , there is malathion limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans for nonHodgkin -
Jul 14, 2023 · IARC classified aspartame as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) on the basis of limited evidence for cancer in humans (specifically, for hepatocellular carcinoma, which is a type of liver cancer). There was also limited evidence for cancer in experimental animals and limited evidence related to the possible mechanisms for causing cancer.
cancer and DDT levels measured in samples of blood or fat. The herbicide 2,4-D was classified as . possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on. inadequate evidence. in humans and . limited evidencein experimental animals. There is strong evidence that 2,4D -
Jun 29, 2023 · In IARC Monographs terminology, "possibly carcinogenic to humans" means there's limited evidence a substance may cause cancer in humans, and sufficient evidence from animal trials. It's the same designation given to gas engine exhausts, the occupational hazards of being a barber or hairdresser, and using aloe vera.
Jun 10, 2012 · IARC evaluations made of the carcinogenicity of trace elements and related compounds to humans by the international agency of research on cancer (IARC 1993) Group 1: carcinogenic to humans. Group 2A: probably carcinogenic. Group 2B: possibly carcinogenic. Group 3: not classifiable.
May 19, 2016 · Group 1: Definitely carcinogenic to humans. Some examples include arsenic, asbestos, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, Plutonium, processed meat, and Ultraviolet Radiation. Group 2A: Probably carcinogenic to humans. There isn’t enough evidence to definitively conclude that these substances cause cancer, but there’s enough to warrant the warning label.
