Search results
The Lawphil Project - Legal Updates. Republic Act No. 11954. MAHARLIKA INVESTMENT FUND. An Act Establishing The Maharlika Investment Fund, Providing for the Management, Investment, and Use of the Proceeds of the Fund, And for Other Purposes. Republic Act No. 11951.
The validity of fixed-term employment and the legality of dismissal are the main issues in this petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assailing the Court of Appeal's Decision dated July 1, 2016 1 in CA-G.R. SP No. 142370, which affirmed the findings of the National Labor Relations Commission. ANTECEDENTS.
New rule on psychological incapacity. During the En Banc deliberation on Tuesday, May 11, 2021, the Supreme Court in the case of Tan-Andal v. Andal, G.R. No. 196359, unanimously modified the interpretation of the requirements of psychological incapacity as a ground for declaration of nullity of marriage found in Article 36 of the Family Code.
G.R. No. 207613. REYMAN G. MINSOLA, Petitioner. vs. NEW CITY BUILDERS, INC. and ENGR. ERNEL FAJARDO, Respondents. D E C I S I O N. REYES, JR., J.: In labor cases; the courts are tasked with the delicate act of balancing the employee's right to security of tenure vis-a-vis the employer's right to freely exercise its management prerogatives.
The first Petition, docketed as G.R. No. 231015, is filed by RG Cabrera Corporation, Inc. (RGCCI), against the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) and Commission on Audit (COA; collectively, respondents) seeking the reversal of Decision No. 2015-411 5 dated December 28, 2015 and Resolution No. 2017-010 6 dated February 27, 2017 of ...
G.R. No. 175025 February 15, 2012. ROGELIO J. JAKOSALEM and GODOFREDO B. DULFO, Petitioners, vs. ROBERTO S. BARANGAN, Respondent. D E C I S I O N. DEL CASTILLO, J.: This case exemplifies the age-old rule that the one who holds a Torrens title over a lot is the one entitled to its possession. 1. This Petition for Review on Certiorari 2 under ...
Both failing to obtain reconsideration from the CA Decision, 48 RNB and RMPC filed the subject petitions, docketed as G.R. No. 236331 49 and G.R. No. 236332, 50 respectively. The Arguments of RNB and RMPC. RNB asserts that the CA erred in declaring RMPC as a labor-only contractor.
