Search results
Clear and present danger is a doctrine used to test whether limitations may be placed on First Amendment free speech rights. It was established in the case of Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919). Charles Schenck, general secretary of the American Socialist Party was arrested and convicted for sending 15,000 anti-draft circulars through ...
May 22, 2024 · clear and present danger: 1 n a standard for judging when freedom of speech can be abridged “no one has a right to shout `fire' in a crowded theater when there is no fire because such an action would pose a clear and present danger to public safety” Type of: danger the condition of being susceptible to harm or injury
Schenck v. United States, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on March 3, 1919, that freedom of speech could be restricted if the words spoken or printed ‘create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils which Congress has a right to prevent.’
The meaning of SCHENCK V. UNITED STATES is 249 U.S. 47 (1919), subverted the apparent absolute nature of First Amendment protections of freedom of speech by establishing a 'clear and present danger' test by which certain forms of incendiary speech become prosecutable. The case involved two New York Socialists who were convicted under the ...
Noun 1. clear and present danger - a standard for judging when freedom of speech can be abridged; "no one has a right to shout `fire' in a crowded theater... Clear and present danger - definition of clear and present danger by The Free Dictionary
The clear-and-present-danger doctrine is a freedom of speech doctrine first announced by the U.S. Supreme Court in Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47, 39 S. Ct. 247, 63 L. Ed. 470 (1919), during a controversial period in U.S. history when the First Amendment often clashed with the government's interest in maintaining order and morale during ...
Clear and Present Danger Test. Cases. Early in the 20th century, the Supreme Court established the clear and present danger test as the predominant standard for determining when speech is protected by the First Amendment. The Court crafted the test — and the bad tendency test, with which it is often conflated or contrasted — in cases ...
