Search results
5 days ago · The Russo-Ukraine war has shown that there are huge disincentives to the use of nuclear weapons, that there can be significant escalation on the conventional side without risking a nuclear attack—even when only one side possesses nuclear weapons.
Searches related to Should nuclear weapons be used in a war?
5 days ago · If the Soviet Union’s 100-megaton Tsar Bomba was the epitome of the Cold War arms race, the new race is best represented by the lower-yield “tactical” nuclear weapons that Russia has ...
5 days ago · At present, Russia would be prepared to use atomic weapons only in the case that the country is attacked with them by a nuclear-armed power, or if the very existence of the Russian state is ...
5 days ago · The Biden strategy reflects the Pentagon’s projections that China will expand its long-range nuclear weapons to 1,000 by 2030 and 1,500 by 2035, ... at least according to nuclear-war-fighting ...
1 day ago · The speaker of the lower house, Vyacheslav Volodin, warned that strikes on Russia would lead to war with nuclear weapons and reminded the European Parliament that its headquarters in Strasbourg ...
5 days ago · As Russia’s war in Ukraine drags on, there is a heightened risk of escalation that could involve US or NATO forces, or Russian nuclear threats, or even nuclear weapons use. In addition, there is a growing risk of a conflict with nuclear-armed China over its claims to Taiwan.
People also ask
Was atomic bombing necessary in World War II?
Did US leaders know we didn't have to drop atomic bombs?
Was the atomic bombing necessary to end the Pacific War?
Why did the US use fission bombs?
2 days ago · Alexander Werth, historian and BBC Eastern Front war correspondent, suggests that the nuclear bombing of Japan mainly served to demonstrate the new weapon in the most shocking way, virtually at the Soviet Union's doorstep, in order to prepare the political post-war field.
