Search results
The trolley problem is a series of thought experiments in ethics, psychology and artificial intelligence involving stylized ethical dilemmas of whether to sacrifice one person to save a larger number.
A game that gives you increasingly absurd trolley problems. Help humanity solve philosophy by solving all the trolley problems.
Learn what the Trolley Problem is, a moral dilemma that tests our ethical decision-making. Explore different scenarios, definitions, and related topics that help us understand the Trolley Problem and its implications.
May 31, 2024 · The trolley problem is a philosophical dilemma that tests the limits of moral responsibility and the doctrine of double effect. Learn about the origin, variations, arguments, and solutions of this classic ethical question.
- One of the original versions of the trolley problem is this: Why does it seem permissible or even obligatory to kill one track worker to save five...
- The trolley problem originated in a 1967 essay by the British philosopher Philippa Foot, who used it in constructing a partial defense of the doctr...
- The trolley problem is important because versions of it have been used to explore the validity and range of application of the doctrine of double e...
- Utilitarianism holds that an action is right if it maximizes happiness for the agent and for everyone affected. Accordingly, in the trolley problem...
The trolley dilemma is a hypothetical scenario that tests your moral judgment in a life-or-death situation. You have to choose between diverting a tram that will kill five people or pushing a man off a bridge to stop it. Learn about the utilitarian, Kantian, and psychological perspectives on this dilemma and its variations.
The trolley problem is a thought experiment that tests your moral choices in a hypothetical scenario. Learn about its history, variations, and applications in philosophy, politics, and entertainment.
How do people judge moral dilemmas involving tradeoffs between one and many lives? This article reviews a study that identifies two factors influencing our moral approval: personal force and means/side-effect. It also discusses the implications for normative ethics and moral psychology.
