Search results
Sep 11, 2015 · Relativism, roughly put, is the view that truth and falsity, right and wrong, standards of reasoning, and procedures of justification are products of differing conventions and frameworks of assessment and that their authority is confined to the context giving rise to them. More precisely, “relativism” covers views which maintain that—at a ...
Relativism is a family of philosophical views which deny claims to objectivity within a particular domain and assert that valuations in that domain are relative to the perspective of an observer or the context in which they are assessed. [1] There are many different forms of relativism, with a great deal of variation in scope and differing ...
Relativism is the view that some things are relative to a framework or standpoint, and that no standpoint is privileged over others. Learn about different types and examples of relativism in ethics, epistemology, and aesthetics.
Relativism is the idea that truth, morality, or culture is relative to something else, such as situation or perspective. Learn about the different types of relativism, how they apply to various domains, and why they are controversial and relevant in today's society.
Ethical relativism is the view that there are no absolute moral truths and that what is right or wrong depends on personal or cultural perspectives. Learn about the historical and philosophical origins of this doctrine, its challenges and criticisms, and its relation to postmodernism.
Feb 2, 2003 · Historical relativism (or historicism, in one of its many meanings) is the view that groups from quite different historical epochs will have different modes of thought. The British philosopher and historian R. G. Collingwood (e.g., 1940, esp. ch. 6) particularly stressed the historical dimension of relativism, but many other thinkers agreed.
Feb 19, 2004 · Moral relativism is an important topic in metaethics. It is also widely discussed outside philosophy (for example, by political and religious leaders), and it is controversial among philosophers and nonphilosophers alike. This is perhaps not surprising in view of recent evidence that people’s intuitions about moral relativism vary widely.
