Search results
There is ongoing legal debate about the constitutionality of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact in the United States. At issue are interpretations of the Compact Clause of Article I, Section X , and states ' plenary power under the Presidential Electors Clause of Article II, Section I .
Jan 4, 2017 · The Constitution grants states the power to enter into an agreement or compact with other states, as long as there is congressional approval. However, the Supreme Court has ruled that congressional approval is only required if the compact infringes on the powers of the federal government.
People also ask
Is the national popular vote interstate compact constitutional?
When does the national popular vote interstate compact go into effect?
What is the national popular vote interstate compact (NPVIC)?
Is the national popular vote interstate compact binding?
Oct 26, 2018 · The current compacting states possess 165 electoral votes, and therefore need only 105 more before the Compact takes effect, a total that can be reached with the consent of as few as four more states. This article argues that this possibility makes the Compact a constitutional crisis–in–waiting.
Main article: Constitutionality of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. There is ongoing legal debate about the constitutionality of the NPVIC. At issue are interpretations of the Compact Clause of Article I, Section X, and states' plenary power under the Elections Clause of Article II, Section I .
- Status of The Compact by State
- Text of The Compact
- Arguments
- Constitutionality of Compact
- History
- See Also
- External Links
This page was last updated in May 2024. States shaded in blue had enacted National Popular Vote Interstate Compact legislation. The following table provides a timeline of what states had joined the NPVIC, what political parties controlled government at the time, and the state's electoral votes based on the results of the 2020 census.
The legislature of each member state passes the laws with certain and modifications, but the core of the legislation remains the same.
The Congressional Research Servicepublished a document on the NPVIC, which contained arguments for and against the compact. The following are excerpts of the arguments:
The Compact Clause of the U.S. Constitutionsays that "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress... enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State..." Proponents of the NPVIC argue that the compact is constitutional, whereas opponents argue the compact is an unconstitutional violation of the Compact Clause without Congress' consent.
Computer scientist john Koza founded the National Popular Vote Inc., a nonprofit, in 2006.The organization's first press release said: "Republicans, Democrats and Independents, including former Republican Representative and Independent presidential candidate John Anderson, joined together today to call for the national popular election of the Presi...
Yet, by May 2021, 15 states and Washington, D.C., had signed onto the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. This constitutes a violation of the Compact Clause, which states that “No State shall, without the Consent of Congress…enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State.”.
Unable to secure passage of a federal constitutional amendment abolishing the Electoral College, several opponents of the Electoral College have sought to establish the direct, popular election of the President via an interstate compact according to which individual signatory states agree to appoint their presidential electors in accordance with...
