Search results
Separate but equal was a legal doctrine in United States constitutional law, according to which racial segregation did not necessarily violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which nominally guaranteed "equal protection" under the law to all people
Learn about the legal doctrine that allowed racial segregation in the U.S. until 1954, and how it was challenged and overturned by the Supreme Court. Explore the legacy and impact of \"separate but equal\" on social and economic inequalities.
Oct 29, 2009 · Learn about the 1896 Supreme Court case that upheld racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. Find out how the case challenged the constitutional rights of Black people and paved the way for Jim Crow laws.
Learn about the infamous Supreme Court decision in 1896 that allowed racial segregation laws in the United States. Find out the background, the case, the holding, and the aftermath of the \"separate but equal\" doctrine that was overruled by Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.
May 11, 2024 · Plessy v. Ferguson, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on May 18, 1896, by a seven-to-one majority (one justice did not participate), advanced the controversial ‘separate but equal’ doctrine for assessing the constitutionality of racial segregation laws.
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality, a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal".
Oct 27, 2009 · Learn how the Supreme Court ruled in 1954 that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional and violated the 14th Amendment. Explore the impact of this landmark decision on the civil rights movement and the nation's education system.