Search results
A Question of Adultery. A Question of Adultery (U.S. title: The Case of Mrs. Loring) is a 1958 British drama film directed by Don Chaffey and starring Julie London and Anthony Steel. [1] The film was loosely based on the 1948 play Breach of Marriage by Dan Sutherland. [2] A novelisation of the film was written by Gordon Wellesley.
Feb 5, 2016 · The Case of Mrs. Loring (aka A Question of Adultery) (1958) 1h 26min | Drama | 10 February 1959 (USA) A sterile race car driver seeks a divorce after his wife is artificially inseminated. Director: Don Chaffey Writers: Anne Edwards (written for the screen by), Denis Freeman (additional scenes) Stars: Julie London, Anthony Steel, Basil Sydney
- February 05, 2016
- Film Gorillas
- 84 min
- 139
Writer. Mark Loring is madly jealous of his wife, Mary, former American cabaret singer. Due to an automobile accident, she loses her unborn child, and Mark becomes sterile. His father, Brit-stuffy Sir John Loring, has never approved of the marriage and, again, tries to break it up. Believing that a child will hold the marriage together, Mary ...
A Question of Adultery Released Feb 10, 1959 1h 26m Drama List Reviews A sterile racecar driver seeks a divorce after his wife is artificially inseminated.
- Drama
- Julie London
- Don Chaffey
Summaries. Mark Loring is madly jealous of his wife, Mary, former American cabaret singer. Due to an automobile accident, she loses her unborn child, and Mark becomes sterile. His father, Brit-stuffy Sir John Loring, has never approved of the marriage and, again, tries to break it up. Believing that a child will hold the marriage together, Mary ...
A Question of Adultery (1958) Directed by Don Chaffey Genres - Drama | Release Date - Dec 12, 1958 (USA - Unknown), Feb 10, 1959 (USA) | Run Time - 86 min. | Countries - United Kingdom | MPAA Rating - NR
People also ask
Is a question of adultery based on a true story?
How long is the case of Mrs Loring a question of adultery?
What is adultery without question?
What is the point of adultery?
Review by 1. The first 40 minutes is a truly brilliant and interesting study into a jealous relationship and is startlingly progressive (and true to modern life!), and although the court case has its own highs and lows, the highs of this inventive first half are never reached again. Still, stupidly well written given that the print I saw ...
