Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. www.apache.org › licenses › LICENSE-2Apache License, Version 2.0 - The Apache Software Foundation

   www.apache.org › licenses › LICENSE-2

   • Cached

   The 2.0 version of the Apache License, approved by the ASF in 2004, helps us achieve our goal of providing reliable and long-lived software products through collaborative, open-source software development. All packages produced by the ASF are implicitly licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0, unless otherwise explicitly stated.

2. en.wikipedia.orgApache License 2.0 with LLVM Exceptions - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org

   • Cached

   Language links are at the top of the page. Search. Search

3. People also ask

   What is the Apache License?

   • The 2.0 version of the Apache License, approved by the ASF in 2004, helps us achieve our goal of providing reliable and long-lived software products through collaborative, open-source software development. All packages produced by the ASF are implicitly licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0, unless otherwise explicitly stated.

   Apache License, Version 2.0 - The Apache Software Foundation

   www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html?source=post_page---------------------------

   See all results for this question

   Should GitHub be licensed under Apache?

   • The Apache License 2.0 in particular is being adopted quite frequently. In 2020, for example, 18.2% of GitHub projects were licensed under Apache 2.0. With such a high usage rate, both developers and companies would benefit from learning the ins and outs of this particular license.

   Open Source Licenses 101: Apache License 2.0 - FOSSA - Dependency H…

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-licenses-101-apache-license-2-0/

   See all results for this question

   Do I need to release modified code under Apache 2.0?

   • However, you do not need to release the modified code under Apache 2.0. Simply including any modification notifications is enough to comply with the license terms. The Apache License 2.0 outlines what users are allowed to do with the licensed code. Under this license, users can:

   Open Source Licenses 101: Apache License 2.0 - FOSSA - Dependency H…

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-licenses-101-apache-license-2-0/

   See all results for this question

   Why do developers choose permissive licenses other than Apache?

   • The main reason developers choose permissive licenses other than Apache 2.0 is a controversy about whether it is compatible with GPL v2. When developers create code to be used in a GPL2 product, they usually choose MIT instead. Companies incorporate OSS licensed under Apache 2.0 for several reasons.

   Open Source Licenses 101: Apache License 2.0 - FOSSA - Dependency H…

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-licenses-101-apache-license-2-0/

   See all results for this question

4. fossa.com › blog › open-source-licenses-101-apacheOpen Source Licenses 101: Apache License 2.0 - FOSSA

   fossa.com › blog › open-source-licenses-101-apache

   • Cached

   • Che License 2.0: The Basics
   • Che License 2.0 vs. Other Permissive Licenses
   • Cases For The Apache License 2.0
   • Future of The Apache License 2.0

   Open source licenses come in two flavors: permissive and copyleft. The Apache License 2.0 is in the permissive category, meaning that users can do (nearly) anything they want with the code, with very few exceptions. However, unlike that of the MIT license, the text of the Apache License 2.0 is quite dense and difficult to read. You can read it here...

   See full list on fossa.com

   So, what are the major differences between the Apache License 2.0 and other well-known permissive licenses? Let’s compare Apache to two popular alternatives: the MIT license and the BSD license.

   See full list on fossa.com

   The Apache License 2.0 offers a number of permissions and protections that make it appealing to developers and software companies alike.

   See full list on fossa.com

   Permissive OSS licenses like the Apache License 2.0 are growing in popularity, while stronger copyleft licenses are losing ground. The Apache License 2.0 in particular is being adopted quite frequently. In 2020, for example, 18.2% of GitHub projectswere licensed under Apache 2.0. With such a high usage rate, both developers and companies would bene...

   See full list on fossa.com

5. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › GNU_General_Public_LicenseGNU General Public License - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › GNU_General_Public_License

   • Cached

   GPLv3 improved compatibility with several free software licenses such as the Apache License, version 2.0, and the GNU Affero General Public License, which GPLv2 could not be combined with.

6. libguides.wvu.edu › cApache 2.0 License - Open Licenses for sharing your work ...

   libguides.wvu.edu › c

   Feb 6, 2024 · Developed by the Apache Software Foundation and introduced in 2004, the Apache 2.0 License is a is a permissive free software license. The license permits use of the software for any purpose, users are able to distribute it, to modify it, and to distribute modified versions of the software.

7. www.wikidata.org › wiki › Q13785927Apache License, Version 2.0 - Wikidata

   www.wikidata.org › wiki › Q13785927

   • Cached

   Feb 29, 2024 · English. Apache License, Version 2.0. software license approved by the ASF in 2004. Apache License v2.0. ASLv2. ASL2. Apache License 2.0. Apache-2.0. http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.