Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Georgia, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court in March 1832 held that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on Native American land. President Andrew Jackson refused to enforce the ruling, but the decision helped form the basis for most subsequent Indian law in the U.S.

  2. Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832), was a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court vacated the conviction of Samuel Worcester and held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was unconstitutional.

  3. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was signed into law on May 28, 1830, by United States President Andrew Jackson. The law, as described by Congress, provided "for an exchange of lands with the Indians residing in any of the states or territories, and for their removal west of the river Mississippi ".

  4. Aug 30, 2021 · On May 28, 1830, President Andrew Jackson signs the Indian Removal Act into law. The bill enabled the federal government to negotiate with southeastern Native American tribes for their...

  5. In 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act and by 1838 the Cherokee had been forced off their land within the state of Georgia and pushed west towards the Mississippi River. By 1850, 60,000 Native Americans from five tribes – Cherokee, Muscogee, Seminole, Chickasaw, and Choctaw – were removed from their ancestral lands.

  6. Jun 12, 2006 · The Supreme Court, the Principal Chief told his people, decided ‘in our favor.’. So they stayed right where they were, and missionaries encouraged them to stand fast. But they figured without Andrew Jackson — the man the Cherokees called Sharp Knife — and the authorities of Georgia.

  7. Mar 27, 2024 · Andrew Jackson (1829–37) vigorously promoted this new policy, which became incorporated in the Indian Removal Act of 1830. Although the bill provided only for the negotiation with tribes east of the Mississippi on the basis of payment for their lands, trouble arose when the United States resorted to force to gain the Indians’ compliance ...

  1. People also search for