Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. People also ask

  2. The harm principle holds that the actions of individuals should be limited only to prevent harm to other individuals. John Stuart Mill articulated the principle in the 1859 essay On Liberty, where he argued that "The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to ...

  3. Oct 9, 2007 · Third, Mill wants the harm principle to have wide scope. He insists that the harm principle regulates more than relations between government and individuals. Its application should include the family, in particular, relationships between husbands and wives and parents and children (V 12).

  4. Sep 23, 2020 · This article advocates employing John Stuart Mill's harm principle to set the boundary for unregulated free speech, and his Greatest Happiness Principle to regulate speech outside that boundary because it threatens unconsented-to harm.

    • Melina Constantine Bell
    • 2021
  5. Oct 27, 2016 · The harm principle is a liberal idea that people should be free to act unless they harm others. It was proposed by English philosopher John Stuart Mill in his book On Liberty. Learn more about the principle, its applications and limitations.

  6. Learn about the harm principle, a central idea in liberalism that values individual rights and personal liberty. The principle states that people should be free to act as they wish as long as their actions do not cause harm to others.

  7. Jan 29, 2022 · Far and away the best-known proposal for a principled limit to the law is the “harm principle” from John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty. The pivotal sentence of its most famous passage reads: the only purpose for which power can rightfully be exercised over any member of a civilised community against his will is to prevent harm to others.

  8. Jan 19, 2024 · The reason a separate argument is necessary in chapter 2 is precisely that he is carving out a partial qualification of the harm principle for speech (on this issue see Jacobson 2000, Schauer 2011b, and Turner 2014). On Mill’s view, plenty of harmful speech should still be allowed.

  1. People also search for