Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. www.oyez.org › cases › 2022Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh | Oyez

   www.oyez.org › cases › 2022

   Feb 22, 2023 · Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh | Oyez. Media. Oral Argument - February 22, 2023. Opinion Announcement - May 18, 2023. Opinions. Syllabus. Opinion of the Court (Thomas) Concurring opinion (Jackson) Petitioner. Twitter, Inc., et al. Respondent. Mehier Taamneh, et al. Docket no. 21-1496. Decided by. Roberts Court. Lower court.

2. supreme.justia.com › cases › federalTwitter, Inc. v. Taamneh :: 598 U.S. ___ (2023) :: Justia US ...

   supreme.justia.com › cases › federal

   • Cached

   May 18, 2023 · SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. TWITTER, INC. v. TAAMNEH et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. No. 21–1496. Argued February 22, 2023—Decided May 18, 2023. Read More. Opinions. Opinion (Thomas) Concurrence (Jackson)

3. www.supremecourt.gov › opinions › 22pdf21-1496 Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh (05/18/2023)

   www.supremecourt.gov › opinions › 22pdf

   SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. TWITTER, INC. v. TAAMNEH ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 21–1496. Argued February 22, 2023—Decided May 18, 2023.

4. www.scotusblog.com › case-files › casesTwitter, Inc. v. Taamneh - SCOTUSblog

   www.scotusblog.com › case-files › cases

   • Cached

   Feb 22, 2023 · Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh. Share. Holding: Plaintiffs’ allegations that the social-media-company defendants aided and abetted ISIS in its terrorist attack on a nightclub in Instanbul, Turkey fail to state a claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2333 (d) (2). Judgment: Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on May 18, 2023.

5. Videos

   • 

     2:30:55

     c-span.org

     Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh Oral Argument

     Feb 22, 2023

     3.2K Views

   • 

     2:30:23

     youtube.com

     Supreme Court Hears Twitter V. Taamneh Oral Arguments, Case Which May Change Internet Forever | Full

     Feb 22, 2023

     4.4K Views

   • 

     cnn.com

     Live updates: Supreme Court hears Twitter v. Taamneh oral arguments

     Feb 22, 2023

   View all

6. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Twitter,_IncTwitter, Inc. v. Taamneh - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Twitter,_Inc

   • Cached

   Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh, 598 U.S. 471 (2023), was a case of the Supreme Court of the United States. The case considered whether Internet service providers are liable for "aiding and abetting" a designated foreign terrorist organization in an "act of international terrorism", on account of recommending such content posted by users, under ...

7. www.law.cornell.edu › supct › certTwitter, Inc. v. Taamneh - LII / Legal Information Institute

   www.law.cornell.edu › supct › cert

   • Cached

   February 22, 2023. Court below: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. This case asks the Supreme Court to determine whether social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and Google provide substantial assistance to terrorists by allegedly not taking meaningful action to prevent such terrorists from using their services.

8. People also ask

   What does Taamneh say about terrorism?

   • Taamneh posits that for hundreds of years, United States courts have used the couplet to refer to people perpetrating a crime. Taamneh argues that acts of terrorism are, by nature, not events that occur without any human involvement.

   Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh | LII / Legal Information Institute

   www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/21-1496

   See all results for this question

   Why was Taamneh's case dismissed?

   • The court dismissed Taamneh’s case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 12 (b) (6), along with two other cases Gonzalez v. Google LLC and Clayborn v.

   Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh | LII / Legal Information Institute

   www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/21-1496

   See all results for this question

   Did Twitter transmit more than a billion of people?

   • Applying these factors, the Court found that the plaintiffs failed to allege that Twitter did more than transmit information by billions of people—most of whom use the platform for interactions that once took place via mail, on the phone, or in public areas.

   Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh | Oyez - {{meta.fullTitle}}

   www.oyez.org/cases/2022/21-1496

   See all results for this question

9. harvardlawreview.org › twitter-inc-v-taamnehTwitter, Inc. v. Taamneh - Harvard Law Review

   harvardlawreview.org › twitter-inc-v-taamneh

   • Cached

   Nov 13, 2023 · Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh. Quantum physicists recognize that the very act of observing causes an inevitable “disturbance of the object observed.” 1 The Supreme Court can sometimes resemble a physicist observing particles when it grants review of a hot legal question: even its decision to say nothing can create ripples in the law.