Search results
Jul 12, 2005 · Monotype is a Delaware corporation with its typographical division located primarily in Elk Grove Village, Illinois, and its principal place of business in Woburn, Massachusetts. (R. 95-1; Pl.'s Proposed Findings of Fact ("PPFF") at ¶ 1.) ITC is a New York corporation that is wholly owned by Monotype and is run by employees of Monotype.
Plaintiffs Monotype Imaging Inc. and International Typeface Corp. create, license and distribute software programs that generate typeface designs, which programs are commonly known as “fonts.”. Together, the plaintiffs own approximately 2000 fonts. Defendant Bitstream Inc. is a competitor that owns, licenses and distributes approximately ...
People also ask
What does Bitstream's font business mean for Monotype Imaging?
Does Monotype Imaging own bitstream?
Does Bitstream have a font business?
Is bitstream a trademark?
Apr 21, 2005 · See Ty, Inc. v. Jones Group, Inc., 237 F.3d 891, 898 (7 th Cir. 2001) ("Even though no one factor is decisive, the similarity of the marks, the intent of the defendant, and evidence of actual confusion are the "most important factors" in a likelihood of confusion case").
Monotype Imaging, Inc. v. Bitstream, Inc., No. 03 C 4349, 2005 WL 936882 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 21, 2005). The Court also denied summary judgment on Plaintiffs' claims for indirect trademark infringement, contributory copyright infringement, and under the DMCA because genuine issues of fact existed. Go to
Docket for Monotype Imaging Inc v. Bitstream Inc, 1:03-cv-04349 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.
Jun 24, 2003 · Stay ahead of the curve. In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries.
infringement and vicarious copyright infringement. Monotype Imaging, Inc. v. Bitstream, Inc., No. 03 C 4349, 2005 WL 936882 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 21, 2005). The Court also denied summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ claims for indirect trademark infringement, contributory copyright. infringement, and under the DMCA because genuine issues of fact existed.
