Search results
(1) Where uncontroverted pleaded facts show a conveyance of real estate between husband and wife for nominal consideration, does a rebuttable presumption of fraudulent conveyance arise upon challenge of the conveyance by creditors?
Tuttle, 549 A.2d 151, 378 Pa. Super. 466 Table of Authorities for Leopold v. CourtListener is hosted by Free Law Project, the leading nonprofit using data, technology, and advocacy to make the legal system more equitable.
Apr 22, 2016 · Tuttle vs. Oklahoma, 728 F. 2d 456 (10TH CIR 1984) This case stemmed from an Oklahoma City PD officer that responded to robbery in progress call at a bar. This call ultimately turned out to be false and it is speculated that the call was made by Tuttle himself.
Leopold v. Tuttle. The Brocker court determined that nominal consideration is one of the many factors to consider in determining… Tate v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. and Parole. Cary v. Lower Merion School District, 362 Pa. 210, 66 A.2d 762 (1949). Where there are material issues of…
The motion was based on the same October 9 and December. 19, 2007, trespassing incidents. In March 2008, the trial court held a bench trial. UC. of the Hamilton County Municipal Court finding Tuttle guilty of criminal trespass. At. the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court found Tuttle guilty of contempt.
action styled Bernicker, et al. v. Byrne et al., April Term 1996, No. 1204 (C.C.P. Phila). In April 1999, a jury returned a verdict against Byrne in the amount of $1,981,000.00 (the “Byrne Judgment”). On May 28, 1999, the Bernickers assigned and conveyed their interests in the
Louis T. Wierenga. Probate, Estate Planning, Business Law, Tax Law, Personal Injury. State v. Tuttle - 2023-Ohio-2809.
