Search results
Dec 10, 2015 · Walzer’s influence has operated on different levels, of which we can distinguish at least three. There is a micro level, with numerous authors picking up fruitful ideas, lines of inquiries or suggestions, found in Walzer’s work, and appropriating them or using them to pursue further arguments.
Feb 6, 2019 · Almost immediately upon its 1977 publication, Michael Walzer’s Just and Unjust Wars became the most influential modern work on the laws of war. Though written by an avowed anti-war activist who opposed Vietnam, the work won popularity and praise because it rejected both amoral realism and pacifism and sought to resuscitate the tradition of ...
Jan 5, 2023 · Walzer’s argument contributed to the debate in two major ways. First, his argument that allowing the meaning of a good to determine its distribution would produce a type of equality provides a distinctive conception of equality (Walzer developed this argument from Williams 1967 ) as a political relationship.
- reinerj@dickinson.edu
Despite the broad range of his academic inquiries, Walzer’s work can be read as an ongoing dialogue on the dual problem of embracing an anti-impartialist position without excluding distant strangers and striving for a critical perspective without neglecting particularity and difference.
Jun 6, 2017 · And this summary has set aside the question of how Walzer’s political theory intersects with neighboring areas of his thought such as just war theory, Jewish political philosophy, foreign policy, social criticism, and meta-ethics.
- Michael Kocsis
- msk3@queensu.ca
Sep 28, 2021 · “The Moral Standing of States” is the title of an essay Michael Walzer wrote in response to four critics of the theory of nonintervention defended in Just and Unjust Wars. It states a theme to which he has returned in subsequent work. I offer four sets of comments.
People also ask
What is Walzer's influence?
How did Walzer contribute to the debate?
What is the significance of Michael Walzer's work?
What is Walzer's theory?
The first section focuses on Walzer's moral language; its structure, inconsistencies, and theological underpinnings. The second section addresses how Walzer employs this language to justify the sacrifice of combatants in defence of non-combatants.
