Search results
- The status "reviewer invited" implies that your paper has cleared the initial editorial screening. The editor has decided to send your paper for peer review and has sent out invitations to peer reviewers. At this moment, you need not take any action.
www.editage.com › insights › the-status-of-my-submitted-manuscript-is-reviewer-invited-for-2-weekswhat-should-i-do
People also ask
What does invited mean in a review article?
Is an Invited Review a good idea?
How does a journal 'invite' a review?
How do you write a review article?
Jul 6, 2022 · In most cases, you will have been invited by a journal to write the review and they are likely to have asked you to write on a specific topic within your field of expertise.
- Paraminder Dhillon
- 06 July 2022
- 4
- 289, Issue13
- Introduction
- Plan, plan, plan
- Scope
- Timeliness
- Breadth
- Personal movaon
- Author experse
- Novelty
- Structure
- Read, read, read
- Think visually
- Draft, draft, draft
- Introduce the topic
- Avoid the laundry list
- Be balanced
- Cite, cite, cite
- Be reader-friendly
- NO
- NO
- YES
- Allow time for your title and abstract
- Gain feedback and finalise
- Acknowledgements
In addition to writing up research papers, writing review articles is a useful skill to develop early on in your career as a scientist, whether pursuing an aca-demic career path or not. In any field of science, it’s important to read widely to keep up to date with the latest developments, and writing a review article encourages you to critically ev...
good review article requires careful planning. Rather than diving deep into the writing, it’s best to take time to think about what and how you will write and to draw up an outline of the text and graphics. It com-monly takes a few months to get to the stage of having complete first draft for submission and you should work backwards from your deadl...
A key step of the planning stage is to pinpoint what the scientific focus of the review article will be. In most cases, you will have been invited by a journal to write the review and they are likely to have asked you to write on a specific topic within your field of expertise. However, sometimes the invitation is more open-ended or you wish to pro...
Has there been a sufficient body of recent research into this topic?
Is the chosen topic focused enough to be manageable but broad enough to capture a large readership?
Is the author team interested and enthusiastic about the topic?
Is the author team adequately well-versed on the topic to be able to write an authoritave review?
Has there been a closely related review arcle published recently? Can the author offer a new perspecve on the topic?
Once you’ve pinned down the scientific content of the review, it’s time to define the structure of the article. During the writing process, the outline you’ve drawn up is likely to be refined with additional subheadings as you incorporate details on the topic, but it’s good to have a broad framework to work with at the outset, and many journals req...
When you begin the process of developing a review, you’re likely to have a good idea of what you’ll cover and what the seminal papers in the field are. Nonethe-less, it’s recommended that you start by reading far and wide to ensure that you are as up to date as possi-ble on the history and recent advances within the field. This isn’t an easy task, ...
The phrase ‘a picture is worth a thousand words’ is more important than ever in the writing of a review article. Figures can be invaluable as a means of con-cisely summarising key concepts and making the con-tent accessible to nonspecialist readers, as well as to readers within the field—a fundamental goal of a review article. Figures break up long...
Having planned your review article meticulously, from scope to references to figures, the actual writing part should be relatively easy! As mentioned earlier, the writing could be divided amongst authors, with each author taking on a distinct subtopic or section of the article, or one author might take the lead on writing with input from others. Be...
Firstly, always provide an overall introduction to the topic of your review, with adequate background and context to highlight why the topic is important, timely and worth reflecting on. Any specific goals of your arti-cle, such as to discuss the evidence in favour of a par-ticular model or mechanism, should be outlined in your introductory section...
No matter how much ground you need to cover, don’t be tempted to write a review in the style of a laundry list, with different sets of findings briefly described with min-imal links, discussion and interpretation. This can be repetitive, dull and ineffective at driving a central point home to readers [12]. The laundry list style can be avoided by c...
Importantly, you should ensure that you are providing a balanced overview of the available research, even if you eventually build up to taking a particular view-point. It’s challenging and usually unnecessary to — — produce a review article that comprehensively sum-marises a field, but you should nonetheless strive to discuss all pertinent findings...
Unless it’s a particularly well-established or historic piece of information (e.g. ‘Alzheimer’s disease is a neu-rodegenerative disorder’), most of the fact-based state-ments in your review article should be supported by citing an appropriate source. When describing a piece of research, ensure that there’s no ambiguity in who performed the work and...
Another key point to keep in mind when writing a review article is that the content should be largely accessible to newcomers to the field. Thus, it’s Is the figure original i.e. created by you or for you by an arst/illustrator/ photographer, specifically for the arcle you’re wring? YES
Has the figure been redrawn using a previously published figure as a general guide or created using data or results reported elsewhere?
Has the figure been adapted e.g., has informaon been added or removed compared with the original figure, or reproduced from a previously published figure that is not open
access? NO Has the figure been adapted or reproduced from a previously published figure from an open access arcle? YES Permission is not required. Aribuon is usually required if the figure was created for you by somebody else. Permission is not required, provided that the new figure is substanally different from the original figure (this may be dif...
As emphasised for research papers [8], authors should devote time and effort to the title and abstract of a review article. As the gateway to your article, the title is extremely important. While titles for research articles should simply and succinctly describe the work per-formed, you have more creative licence with the title of a review article ...
Once you and your co-authors are satisfied with your first complete draft, it’s a good idea to ask colleagues, including those who don’t work in your field, to read through and give you honest and constructive feed-back. This can help you to optimise the content, clar-ity and accessibility of your article. If English isn’t your first language, it c...
Sincere thanks go to colleagues at FEBS for helpful feedback on this article and to Giannina Bartlett for consider whether the article cites the most relevant assistance with figures.
Jan 17, 2024 · Writing a review article is equivalent to conducting a research study, with the information gathered by the author (reviewer) representing the data. Like all major studies, it involves conceptualisation, planning, implementation, and dissemination , all of which may be detailed in a methodology section, if necessary. Hence, the methodological ...
The "Invited" meaning that there is no point in submitting in a review article to the journal in the hope of getting it published. Instead the journal will in some way invite the reviews they will accept for review.
Sep 10, 2020 · Don’t: Be discouraged if your outline keeps changing as you get further into the writing process. Writing and structuring your review should be iterative as you continue to refine, read more papers, and start to actually get words down on the page. Don’t: Summarize the results and rehash the discussion of papers you are citing.
When you act as a reviewer, you will be the first to read an article in progress and be informed about the results of the most recent research. This will give you an edge, and support your own work. To learn new methods and statistics. Most probably, you are an expert in the topic of the papers you are requested to review.
Jun 30, 2021 · First, start with a clear question: focused or more general depending on the type of review you are conducting. Systematic reviews tend to address very focused questions often summarizing the evidence of your topic. Other types of reviews tend to have broader questions and are more exploratory in nature.
