Search results
- Peer review is a workhorse of the writing classroom, for good reason. Students receive feedback from each other without the need for the instructor to comment on every submission. In commenting on each other’s work, they develop critical judgment that they can bring to bear on their own writing.
krieger.jhu.edu › writing-program › writing-toolkitPeer Review | University Writing Program | Johns Hopkins ...
People also ask
Can peer reviewing improve students' grades on written assignments?
Can peer review improve writing skills?
What is an academic review?
What is the purpose of a review?
By Amanda Leary. Providing feedback is one of the most critical tasks of teaching. Well-balanced feedback, addressing both achievements and areas for improvement, can help students develop new skills, reinforce their learning, and boost their academic confidence.
Apr 10, 2019 · In addition, that the effect of peer review persists despite controlling for students’ grades on previous writing assignments suggests that being more critical in peer reviews may help students become better writers (e.g., rather than more critical readers simply being better writers to begin with).
- Matthew M. Yalch, Erika M. Vitale, J. Kevin Ford
- 2019
- What Is A Review?
- Common Problems with Academic Reviews
- Getting Started: Approaches to Reading and Notetaking
- Understand and Analyze The Work
- Organizing and Writing The Review
A scholarly review describes, analyzes, and evaluates an article, book, film, or performance (through this guide we will use the term “work” to refer to the text or piece to be reviewed). A review also shows how a work fits into its disciplines and explains the value or contribution of the work to the field. Reviews play an important role in schola...
A review is not a research paper
Rather than a research paper on the subject of the work,an academic review is an evaluation about the work’s message, strengths, and value. For example, a review of Finis Dunaway’s Seeing Greenwould not include your own research about media coverage of the environmental movement; instead, your review would assess Dunaway’s argument and its significance to the field.
A review is not a summary
It is important to synthesize the contents and significance of the work you review, but the main purpose of a review is to evaluate, critically analyze, or comment on the text. Keep your summary of the work brief, and make specific references to its message and evidence in your assessment of the work.
A review is not an off-the-cuff, unfair personal response
An effective review must be fair and accurate. It is important to see what is actually in front of you when your first reaction to the tone, argument, or subject of what you are reviewing is extremely negative or positive. You will present your personal views on the work, but they must be explained and supported with evidence. Rather than writing, “I thought the book was interesting,” you can explain why the book was interesting and how it might offer new insights or important ideas. Further,...
Pre-Reading
Pre-reading helps a reader to see a book as a whole. Often, the acknowledgments, preface, and table of contents of a book offer insights about the book’s purpose and direction. Take time before you begin chapter one to read the introduction and conclusion, examine chapter titles, and to explore the index or references pages. Read more about strategies for critical and efficient reading
Reverse outline
A reverse outline helps a reader analyze the content and argument of a work of non-fiction. Read each section of a text carefully and write down two things: 1) the main point or idea, and 2) its function in the text. In other words, write down what each section says and what it does. This will help you to see how the author develops their argument and uses evidence for support.
Double-entry notebook
In its simplest form, the double-entry notebook separates a page into two columns. In one column, you make observations about the work. In the other, you note your responses to the work. This notetaking method has two advantages. It forces you to make both sorts of notes — notes about the work and notes about your reaction to the work — and it helps you to distinguish between the two. Whatever method of notetaking you choose, do take notes, even if these are scribbles in the margin. If you do...
It is extremely important to work toward seeing a clear and accurate picture of a work. One approach is to try to suspend your judgment for a while, focusing instead on describing or outlining a text. A student once described this as listening to the author’s voice rather than to their own. Ask questions to support your understanding of the work.
A review is organized around an assessment of the work or a focused message about its value to the field. Revisit your notes and consider your responses to your questions from critical reading to develop a clear statement that evaluates the work and provides an explanation for that evaluation. For example: X is an important work because it provides...
Nov 1, 2021 · Review. Writing instruction improves students’ writing skills differentially depending on focal instruction and children: A meta-analysis for primary grade students. Young-Suk GraceKima, DandanYanga, MarcelaReyesb, CarolConnora. Show more. Add to Mendeley. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100408Get rights and content.
- Young-Suk Grace Kim, Dandan Yang, Marcela Reyes, Carol Connor
- 2021
Reflective writing often serves multiple purposes simultaneously, enabling students to deepen their component skills and conceptual understanding within a specific field of study while also developing their metacognitive knowledge of their own learning habits and practices.
Results suggest that the more critical students were of their peers’ writing, the higher their grades were on their own writing, an effect that persisted when controlling for...
Peer review is a workhorse of the writing classroom, for good reason. Students receive feedback from each other without the need for the instructor to comment on every submission. In commenting on each other’s work, they develop critical judgment that they can bring to bear on their own writing.
