Search results
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
For this speech, Brandenburg was convicted under the Ohio Criminal Syndicalism statute, which made it illegal to advocate “crime, sabotage, violence, or unlawful methods of terrorism as a means of accomplishing industrial or political reform.”
Jan 1, 2009 · In Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), the Supreme Court established that speech advocating illegal conduct is protected under the First Amendment unless the speech is likely to incite “imminent lawless action.”.
Apr 5, 2024 · Clarence Brandenburg was the leader of an Ohio chapter of the Ku Klux Klan, a white supremacist group opposed to the civil rights movement. In the summer of 1964, he invited a Cincinnati reporter to film a membership rally.
Brandenburg, who was a leader in the Ku Klux Klan, made a speech at a rally that advocated violence. As a result of the speech, Brandenburg was criminally charged under the Ohio Criminal Syndicalism Act.
May 5, 2022 · In a per curiam opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court justices agreed that Ohio's law was unconstitutional and overturned Brandenburg's conviction. A Quick Summary of Limitations on the First Amendment Brandenburg alleged that Ohio's Syndicalism law violated his First Amendment rights.
People also ask
Who was Clarence Brandenburg?
What is Brandenburg v Ohio?
Did the Ohio law violate Brandenburg's right to freedom of speech?
Who were Clarence Brandenburg & Richard Hanna?
Brandenburg, who was a leader in the Ku Klux Klan, made a speech at a rally that advocated violence. As a result of the speech, Brandenburg was criminally charged under the Ohio Criminal Syndicalism Act.
