Search results
The court found that the respondent was guilty of violating Canon 13, Rule Case 13.02, and Canon 11 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, Section 3, 7 and 8 of Canon 1, Sections 1 and 2 of Canon 2.
- About Us
The Lawphil Project - About Us ... Arellano Law Foundation...
- 1987 Philippine Constitution
1987 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES....
- Archives of Bar Questions
Philippine Jurisprudence - Bar Questionaires Archive. BAR...
- Acts
The Lawphil Project. ACTS - PHILIPPINE STATUTES. 1972; ......
- Administrative Agencie
Government Agencies. Office of the President; Office of the...
- About Us
The Lawphil Project. Click on the year to read the full text of the decision.
G.R. No. 237738. FILOMENA L. VILLANUEVA, Petitioner. vs. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent. D E C I S I O N. PERLAS-BERNABE, J.: Before this Court is a petition for review on certiorari 1 seeking to annul the Decision 2 dated November 3, 2017 of the Sandiganbayan (SB) in SB-11-A/R/0002 which affirmed the Resolution 3 dated November 22, 2007 ...
91 Rule 122, Section 11. Effect of appeal by any of several accused. — (a) An appeal taken by one or more of several accused shall not affect those who did not appeal, except insofar as the judgment of the appellate court is favorable and applicable to the latter; ERIC A. CABARIOS, PETITIONER, VS.
The Lawphil Project - Year 2020 Supreme Court Decisions
A. are not arbitrary, oppressive and consfiscatory as to amount to a deprivation of property without due process of law in violation of Article III, Section 1 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution; B. do not violate the equal protection clause prescribed under Article III, Section 1 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution; and
April 1, 2019 Belina Agbayani Concepcion vs. The Field Investigation Office-Office of the Ombudsman G.R. No. 216795 April 1, 2019 Maersk-Filipinas Crewing Inc. and A.P. Molller A/S vs. Edgar S. Alferos The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation, Inc.
