Search results
The court found that the respondent was guilty of violating Canon 13, Rule Case 13.02, and Canon 11 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, Section 3, 7 and 8 of Canon 1, Sections 1 and 2 of Canon 2.
- About Us
The Lawphil Project - About Us ... Arellano Law Foundation...
- 1987 Philippine Constitution
1987 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES....
- Archives of Bar Questions
Philippine Jurisprudence - Bar Questionaires Archive. BAR...
- Acts
The Lawphil Project. ACTS - PHILIPPINE STATUTES. 1972; Act...
- Administrative Agencie
Government Agencies. Office of the President; Office of the...
- About Us
The Lawphil Project. Click on the year to read the full text of the decision.
May 26, 2021 · Under Section 7 (a) of RA 6713, she is prohibited from directly or indirectly having financial or material interest in any transaction requiring the approval of their office.
Section 7. Prohibited Acts and Transactions. - In addition to acts and omissions of public officials and employees now prescribed in the Constitution and existing laws, the following shall constitute prohibited acts and transactions of any public official and employee and are hereby declared to be unlawful: x x x x.
Jul 1, 2001 · Section 1. Burden of proving authenticity. – The person seeking to introduce an electronic document in any legal proceeding has the burden of proving its authenticity in the manner provided in this Rule. Section 2. Manner of authentication.
The OMR further found that probable cause exists to charge private respondent with perjury for declaring in his PDS that he has not been criminally charged 28 in his 2014 SALN, and for deliberately asserting falsehood under oath for non-disclosure of all his properties for years 2006 to 2014.
This is consistent with Section 5 of the Rules of Court, which provides that it shall be the duty of the private respondent to appear and defend, both in his/her behalf and that of the public respondent affected by the proceedings.
