Search results
Jan 30, 2024 · Q27: Can I use a machine-readable header in my source code files to indicate that the file is under the MPL? Use of a standards-compliant, machine-readable license metadata header in source code files can be compliant with the notice-related goals and requirements of MPL 2.0.
Aug 20, 2021 · Can the MPL be used for libraries? If so, is it effective in making sure the source code remains open? Are there any pitfalls to using this license for a library?
You must make the source code for any of your changes available under MPL, but you can combine the MPL software with proprietary code, as long as you keep the MPL code in separate files. Version 2.0 is, by default, compatible with LGPL and GPL version 2 or greater.
May 9, 2016 · 2 Answers. Sorted by: 9. Yes, you can combine code that is licensed under MPL 2.0 into a project that contains source code from one or more other licenses, including the MIT License.
People also ask
Can I modify the code from MPL?
Can I use a later version of MPL?
Can I combine source code licensed under the MPL?
What is full text MPL?
Can I distribute that code under the terms of MPL 2.0 instead of MPL 1.1? If so, how? Yes, you can, because MPL 1.1 allows anyone who received code under the terms of MPL 1.1 to distribute under the terms of a later version of the MPL.
Aug 12, 2015 · MPL: people can take your code, modify it, but if they distribute the modifications, they need to make sure modifications are publicly available for 3 years. If I don't touch the source code at all, but only use the .jar files in my code, do I need to license my code under MPL as well?
If you do not delete the provisions above, a recipient may use your version of this file under either the MPL or the _____ License." [NOTE: The text of this Exhibit A may differ slightly from the text of the notices in the Source Code files of the Original Code.
