Search results
In Federalist 10, Madison fulfills the promise made in Federalist No. 9 to demonstrate the utility of the proposed union in overcoming the problem of faction. Madison’s argument is the most systematic argument presented in the Federalist Papers, with syllogistically developed reasoning sustained virtually throughout.
Federalist No. 10 is an essay written by James Madison as the tenth of The Federalist Papers, a series of essays initiated by Alexander Hamilton arguing for the ratification of the United States Constitution.
Madison delivers the analogy in two parts. First, he compares how liberty gives rise to factions as how air fuels a fire. He then argues that even with this, liberty should be upheld because of the good that it does in stimulating political conversation, just as how a fire can't exist without air, but neither can people or animals.
According to Madison, what is the purpose of government? Does Madison's argument contradict the premise of the Declaration of Independence that "all men are created equal"? The second expedient is as impracticable as the first would be unwise.
Apr 12, 2019 · What does Madison mean by “faction”? What are the causes of faction? What is wrong with eliminating the causes of faction? Why is so little time spent on minority faction in Federalist 10? How does Publius define a republic? Why is an extended territory such an important element in Madison’s coverage of faction?
Commentary on Federalist 10. This is the first essay by Madison in The Federalist. It contains twenty-three paragraphs. 1. The “violence of faction” is the “mortal disease” of popular governments.
People also ask
What did Federalist 10 say about factions?
What method does Madison support in Federalist 10?
Why are factions bad according to Madison?
What did Madison argue in the Federalist Papers 10?
Written by James Madison, this Federalist 10 defended the form of republican government proposed by the Constitution. Critics of the Constitution argued that the proposed federal government was too large and would be unresponsive to the people.