Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Jan 23, 2007 · Metaethics is the attempt to understand the metaphysical, epistemological, semantic, and psychological, presuppositions and commitments of moral thought, talk, and practice. As such, it counts within its domain a broad range of questions and puzzles, including: Is morality more a matter of taste than truth?

  2. Metaethics is a branch of analytic philosophy that explores the status, foundations, and scope of moral values, properties, and words. Whereas the fields of applied ethics and normative theory focus on what is moral, metaethics focuses on what morality itself is.

  3. the first truly academic work in moral philosophy (in English), modern both in its methods and in the spirit of its approach. . . . It undertakes to provide a systematic comparative study of moral conceptions . . . .1. For Sidgwick, Ethics was moral theory, i.e., the attempt to find a systematic account of the justification of first-order moral ...

  4. Feb 26, 2020 · Metaethics can be described as the philosophical study of the nature of moral judgment. It is concerned with such questions as: Do moral judgments express beliefs or rather desires and inclinations? Are moral judgments apt to be assessed in terms of truth and falsity? Do moral sentences have factual meaning?

  5. Explain the importance of the Euthyphro problem for metaethics. Ethics is the broad study of morality and is often divided into metaethics, normative ethics, and applied ethics. Normative ethics and applied ethics are covered in separate chapters. Each field is distinguished by a different level of inquiry and analysis.

  6. As the list indicates, in meta-ethics the focus is not on the substance of moralitynot on specific recommendations about how to act or what to prefer or the principles that guide such recommendations—but is rather on a range of interrelated semantic, meta-physical, psychological, and epistemological questions about the practice of making ...

  7. People also ask

  8. Jul 12, 2022 · This is not the question about what is metaphysically fundamental, or fundamental simpliciter. It is the question of what the bottom layer of normative facts, so to speak, looks like, and in particular what normative properties show up there, if there is such a bottom layer.

  1. People also search for