Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2017G.R. No. 208936 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2017

   • Cached

   The services of project-based employees are co-terminous with the project and may be terminated upon the end or completion of the project or a phase thereof for which they were hired. 19 The principal test in determining whether particular employees were engaged as project-based employees, as distinguished from regular employees, is whether ...

2. lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2020G.R. No. 217101 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2020

   • Cached

   [ G.R. No. 217101, February 12, 2020 ] LBC EXPRESS-VIS, INC., PETITIONER, VS. MONICA C. PALCO, RESPONDENT. DECISION. LEONEN, J.: An employee is considered constructively dismissed if he or she was sexually harassed by her superior and her employer failed to act on his or her complaint with prompt and sensitivity.

3. People also ask

   What is a sub-strand of jurisprudence?

   • However, there is a sub-strand of jurisprudence where, despite apparent similarity with the facts of the foregoing cases, and notwithstanding the existence of the foregoing doctrines in jurisprudence, the project employee was deemed never to have acquired regular status.

   G.R. No. 239622 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2021/jun2021/gr_239622_2021.html

   See all results for this question

   Does project based employment ripen into regularity?

   • Conversely, project-based employment will not ripen into regularity if the construction worker was truly engaged as a project-based employee, and between each successive project, the employer made no manifestations of any intent to treat the worker as a continuing resource for the main business.

   G.R. No. 239622 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2021/jun2021/gr_239622_2021.html

   See all results for this question

   Are alleged projects'specific undertakings' contemplated by law?

   • Unmistakably, the alleged projects stated in the employment contracts were either too vague or imprecise to be considered as the 'specific undertaking' contemplated by law.

   G.R. No. 239622 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2021/jun2021/gr_239622_2021.html

   See all results for this question

   Are petitioner and PLDT engaged in labor-only contracting?

   • Verily, the ruling of the NLRC that petitioner is the employer of respondents and that it is engaged in a legitimate job contracting is not supported by substantial evidence. The Court finds that petitioner and PLDT are engaged in labor-only contracting.

   G.R. No. 246369 - Lawphil

   www.lawphil.netwww.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2022/mar2022/gr_246369_2022.html

   See all results for this question

4. lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2021G.R. No. 239622 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2021

   • Cached

   Jun 21, 2022 · The Court resolves the interlocking issues of: (1) whether Carpio is a project-based or regular employee of Modair; and (2) whether Carpio was illegally dismissed. Ruling. The Court partially grants the Petition for Review on Certiorari, resolving the first issue in favor of, and the second issue against, Carpio.

5. lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2021Year 2021 Philippine Jurisprudence - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2021

   The Lawphil Project - Year 2021 Supreme Court Decisions

6. www.lawphil.netwww.lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2022G.R. No. 246369 - Lawphil

   www.lawphil.netwww.lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2022

   • Cached

   It ordered PLDT and petitioner to solidarily pay respondents: (1) salary and employee benefits reckoned from the commencement of their work with PLDT; (2) moral and exemplary damages in the amount of P25,000.00 each; and (3) attorney's fees at 10% of the amount of wages recovered. The CA ruled as follows:

7. lawphil.net › statutes › repactsRepublic Act No. 10533 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net › statutes › repacts

   • Cached

   Section 1. Short Title. — This Act shall be known as the "Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013″. Section 2. Declaration of Policy. — The State shall establish, maintain and support a complete, adequate, and integrated system of education relevant to the needs of the people, the country and society-at-large. Likewise, it is hereby declared ...