Search results
The Thorne–Hawking–Preskill bet was a public bet on the outcome of the black hole information paradox made in 1997 by physics theorists Kip Thorne and Stephen Hawking on the one side, and John Preskill on the other, according to the document they signed 6 February 1997, [1] as shown in Hawking's 2001 book The Universe in a Nutshell .
Sep 24, 1991 · John Preskill and Kip Thorne took the position that naked singularities are possible, while Stephen Hawking bet that they are impossible. Hawking conceded " on a technicality" on 5 February 1997 , accepting that naked singularities can form under very special " nongeneric " conditions. A new version of the bet on naked singularitites was then ...
Mar 20, 2018 · Hawking bet another theorist, Kip Thorne of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena, that Cygnus X-1 was not a black hole, with the prize being a magazine subscription. Hawking explained in his 1988 bestseller A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes that the bet was a sort of “insurance policy” for him.
Black hole information bet. Whereas Stephen Hawking and Kip Thorne firmly believe that information swallowed by a black hole is forever hidden from the outside universe, and can never be revealed even as the black hole evaporates and completely disappears, And whereas John Preskill firmly believes that a mechanism for the information to be ...
Mar 3, 2021 · In 1974 Stephen Hawking and Kip Thorne placed a bet on whether Cygnus X-1 was really a black hole. The wager was settled in 1990, but the world’s first black hole is still a mystery.
Mar 23, 2018 · In 1997, he and Kip Thorne, a gravitational theorist at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena, entered a wager with John Preskill, also a Caltech theorist. Hawking and Thorne stuck to their position that black holes destroy information. By 2004, however, Hawking changed his mind and conceded the bet.
Mar 14, 2018 · And bet they did. In 1991, Hawking and Kip Thorne bet Preskill that information that falls into a black hole gets destroyed and can never be retrieved. Called the black hole information paradox, this prospect follows from Hawking’s landmark 1974 discovery about black holes — regions of inescapable gravity, where space-time curves steeply toward a central point known as the singularity.
