Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. lawphil.net › judjuris › judjurisPhilippine Jurisprudence - The LawPhil Project

   lawphil.net › judjuris › judjuris

   • Cached

   The Lawphil Project. Click on the year to read the full text of the decision.

   • Year 2021 Philippine Jurisprudence

     The Lawphil Project - Year 2021 Supreme Court Decisions

   • Arellano Law Foundation, Inc.

     The Lawphil Project - Philippine Laws and Jurisprudence...

2. lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2021G.R. No. 246466 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2021

   • Cached

   The Decision of the Court of Appeals dated July 27, 2018, in CA-G.R. CR-HC No. 09416, finding accused-appellant Reymar Masilang y Laciste guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of murder is hereby AFFIRMED.

3. lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2010G.R. No. 192935 & G.R. No. 193036 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2010

   • Cached

   Jul 21, 2017 · The Philippine Supreme Court, according to Article VIII, Section 1 of the 1987 Constitution, is vested with Judicial Power that "includes the duty of the courts of justice to settle actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable, and to determine whether or not there has been a grave of abuse of discretion ...

4. lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2001G.R. No. 148560 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2001

   • Cached

   Philippine Jurisprudence - Joseph E. Estrada Vs. Sandiganbayan and People of the Philippines

5. www.ww.lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2020Philippine Jurisprudence - June 2020 - The Lawphil Project

   www.ww.lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2020

   • Cached

   Rolando S. Gregorio vs. Commission on Audit and Department of Foreign Affairs. G.R. No. 246674. June 30, 2020. Jorge E. Auro, represented by his heirs Jomar O. Auro and Marjorie O. Auro-Gonzales... G.R. No. 243375.

6. People also ask

   Why did the Philippine Supreme Court deny the Equal Protection argument?

   • 47 In People v. Dela Piedra, 48 the Philippine Supreme Court, adhering to the precedents set in American jurisprudence, likewise denied the equal protection argument of an illegal recruiter, who claimed that others who had likewise performed acts of recruitment remained scot-free:

   G.R. No. 192935 & G.R. No. 193036 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_192935_2010.html

   See all results for this question

   What are the rules of procedure of the Philippine Truth Commission?

   • The Rules of Procedure of the Philippine Truth Commission of 2010 (Rules), promulgated pursuant to Section 2 (j) of EO 1, further flesh out the operations of the Commission. 17 Section 4 assures that "due process shall at all times be observed in the application of the Rules."

   G.R. No. 192935 & G.R. No. 193036 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_192935_2010.html

   See all results for this question

   Is the Philippine Truth Commission violating Article XI & Section 7?

   • SEPARATE OPINION PEREZ, J.: Executive Order No. 1 of President Benigno S. Aquino III Creating the Philippine Truth Commission of 2010 violates Article XI, Section 5 and Section 7 together with Section 13 (1) and (7) and related provisions in Paragraphs (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6) of the same Section 7, all of the Philippine Constitution.

   G.R. No. 192935 & G.R. No. 193036 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_192935_2010.html

   See all results for this question

   What is government of the Philippines v Springer 4?

   • The landmark case of Government of the Philippine Islands v. Springer 4 has mapped out this legal doctrine: The Government of the Philippines Islands is an agency of the Congress of the United States.

   G.R. No. 192935 & G.R. No. 193036 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/dec2010/gr_192935_2010.html

   See all results for this question