Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. The High Court of Madras delivered its judgement and ruled in favor of Champakam Dorairajan. State of Madras appealed this ruling in Supreme Court and thus the case came before the Supreme Court of India.

  2. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Madras_StateMadras State - Wikipedia

    Madras State was a state of India which was in existence during the mid-20th century. The state came into existence on 26 January 1950 when the Constitution of India was adopted and included the present-day Tamil Nadu, Kerala and parts of neighbouring states of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka. Andhra state was separated in 1953 and the state was ...

  3. Sep 30, 2023 · Name of Case: The State of Madras vs Srimathi Champakam Dorairajan 1951 AIR 226, 1951 SCR 525. Composition of the Bench: The Supreme Court of India – Constitution Bench (7 judges) Name of Judges: Das, Sudhi Ranjan Kania, Hiralal J. (Cj) Fazal Ali, Saiyid Sastri, M. Patanjali Mahajan, Mehr Chand Bose, Vivian Mukherjea, B.K.

  4. Sep 17, 2020 · INTRODUCTION. State of Madras vs. Smt. Champakam Dorairajan is a landmark case delivered by the Supreme Court of India that, along with Romesh Thappar vs State of Madras (1950), led to the first amendment to the Indian Constitution In 1951. The State of Madras was the petitioner in the case and Smt. Champakam Doralrajan was the respondent.

  5. Smt. Champakam Dorairajan from the state of Madras was a Brahmin girl. She failed to get admission to a medical college in 1951, although she had scored adequate marks owing to a government-issued collective GO. The quota system was varying in the state of Madras in 1950, compared to the present scenario. The state of Madras ran four medical ...

  6. The precedent established by the ruling in this case underscores the significance of evaluating the voluntariness of actions in instances where minors choose to leave the protective custody of their guardians. Explore the landmark case of S. Varadarajan v State of Madras 1965 AIR 942, involving the ability of minors to renounce guardianship.

  7. People also ask

  8. Feb 2, 2024 · The legal analysis in State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan delves into the constitutional tapestry woven by the framers of the Constitution. The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Harilal Kania, grapples with the intricate balance between ensuring social justice through affirmative action and upholding the cherished principle of equality.

  1. People also search for