Search results
Archived post. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. I’m sure it’s fine, but it’s a general resource as opposed to a resource dedicated specifically to philosophy. Try the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy .
3 days ago · Factual Reporting: HIGH. Country: USA. Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE. Media Type: Website. Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic. MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY. History. Founded in 1768, The Encyclopedia Britannica is a general knowledge English-language encyclopedia.
People also ask
Is Encyclopedia Britannica reliable?
Why should you read the Encyclopedia Britannica?
Are encyclopedias reliable sources of information?
Is Britannica a reliable source?
For a history paper, citing the encyclopedia Britannica for something that happened in a western Caucasian culture is probably pretty solid, but trying to understand the impact of British rule over colonial India would more properly be studied using more local texts to get all of the context.
Encyclopedias tend to basic, basic info. That said, they do sometimes contain biases that show up particularly as they age and social norms change. Good on you for wanting sources, even from the encyclopedia, but the encyclopedia is considered a source in itself.
FYI the Encyclopedia Britannica would not be an acceptable academic source in most contexts either. EB and Wikipedia are both very useful, for slightly different purposes, but neither is intended for academic use. They are instead used to quickly find general information about a broad range of topics.
The Encyclopedia Britannica contains carefully edited articles on all major topics. It fits the ideal purpose of a reference work as a place to get started, or to refer back to as you read and write. The articles in Britannica are written by expert authors who are both identifiable and credible.
