Search results
John Bradford is a Research Ecologist with the USGS Northwest Climate Adaptation Science Center. John studies dryland ecosystems in the context of global change and works with resource managers to identify adaptive strategies for sustaining these ecosystems in a changing world.
Articles 1–20. Research Ecologist, USGS - Cited by 9,848 - Terrestrial ecosystem ecology - ecohydrology - climate change.
Contact: jbradford@usgs.gov. Bio. John Bradford is a research ecologist with the U.S. Geological Survey. His research seeks to understand how climate change and altered drought will interact with disturbances and land use to impact upland vegetation in drylands, which include shrublands, grasslands, woodlands and dry forests.
John BRADFORD, Research Ecologist | Cited by 8,077 | of United States Geological Survey, Colorado (USGS) | Read 229 publications | Contact John BRADFORD
- Conversion Factors
- Open-File Report 2020–1073
- Ecological Forecasting—21st Century Science for 21st Century Management
- U.S. Geological Survey
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Abbreviations—Continued
- Workshop goals
- Result 1—Criteria for Evaluating the Value of Potential Forecast Products
- Demand and relevance (essential)
- Operational implementation
- Value for improving decision-support
- Management-Research integration and long-term adaptive management
- Promising potential ecological forecasting products identified at the workshop.
- Promising potential ecological forecasting products identified at the workshop.—Continued
- Example ecological forecasting of phenology
- Result 3—Insights About Next Steps for Advancing Ecological Forecasting
- Result 4—Recommendations for Supporting Long-Term Management-Research Partnerships
- Conclusions
- Appendixes 1 through 5
- Day 1: Wednesday, May 29
- Day 3: Friday, May 31
- Appendix 2. Standardized Rubric for Describing a Forecast Product
- Appendix 3. Descriptions of the Most Promising Forecast Products Considered at the Workshop
- Forecasting Product Name
- Desired Future State
- Expected Outcome
- Expected Partners and (or) Collaborators
- Expected Stakeholders
- Evaluation Against Standardized Criteria
- Forecasting Product Name
- Desired Future State
- Expected Outcome
- Expected Partners and (or) Collaborators
- Evaluation Against Standardized Criteria
- Modeling Requirements
- Data Requirements
- Cyberinfrastructure Requirements
- Opportunities for Emergent Advanced Technologies
- Forecasting Product Name
- Desired Future State
- Expected Outcome
- Expected Partners and (or) Collaborators
- Expected Stakeholders
- Product Description
- Evaluation Against Standardized Criteria
- Data Requirements
- Cyberinfrastructure Requirements
- Human Infrastructure Requirements
- Opportunities for Emergent Advanced Technologies
- Summary of Resource Requirements
- Timeline With Milestones
- Forecasting Product Name
- Desired Future State
- Expected Outcome
- Expected Partners and (or) Collaborators
- Expected Stakeholders
- Product Description
- Modeling Requirements
- Data Requirements
- Cyberinfrastructure Requirements
- Human Infrastructure Requirements
- Opportunities for Emergent Advanced Technologies
- Desired Future State
- Expected Outcome
- Expected Partners and (or) Collaborators
- Expected Stakeholders
- Product Description
- Human Infrastructure Requirements
- Forecasting Product Name
- Desired Future State
- Expected Outcome
- Expected Partners and (or) Collaborators
- Expected Stakeholders
- Forecasting Product Name
- Desired Future State
- Expected Outcome
- Expected Partners and (or) Collaborators
- Expected Stakeholders
- Product Description
- Evaluation Against Standardized Criteria
- Modeling Requirements
- Data Requirements
- Forecasting Product Name
- Desired Future State
- Expected Partners and (or) Collaborators
- Expected Stakeholders
- Evaluation Against Standardized Criteria
- Modeling Requirements
- Data Requirements
- Forecasting Product Name
- Desired Future State
- Expected Outcome
- Product Description
- Evaluation Against Standardized Criteria
- Forecasting Product Name
- Desired Future State
- Expected Outcome
- Expected Partners and (or) Collaborators
- Expected Stakeholders
- Product Description
- Modeling Requirements
- Data Requirements
- Cyberinfrastructure Requirements
- Human Infrastructure Requirements
- Opportunities for Emergent Advanced Technologies
- Summary of Resource Requirements
- Forecast product type
- Summary of discussion
- Forecast product type
- Appendix 5. Ratings of Specific Potential Forecast Products by Topic
U.S. customary units to International System of Units Multiply By
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey
By John B. Bradford, Jake F. Weltzin, Molly McCormick, Jill Baron, Zack Bowen, Sky Bristol, Daren Carlisle, Theresa Crimmins, Paul Cross, Joe DeVivo, Mike Dietze, Mary Freeman, Jason Goldberg, Mevin Hooten, Leslie Hsu, Karen Jenni, Jennifer Keisman, Jonathan Kennen, Kathy Lee, David Lesmes, Keith Loftin, Brian W. Miller, Peter Murdoch, Jana Newm...
U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey
This workshop was enabled by financial support from the USGS Ecosystems Mission Area and logistical support from the USGS John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis. In addition, we appreciate the engagement, enthusiasm, and participant support provided by our partner agencies and the USGS Executive Leadership Team. The findings and concl...
AIM BISON BLM BOEM BOR COAWST CSS CWD DOI EDDMapS EDRR EF ELT EPA FIA FS FTE FWS FY GS INHABIT IWP LiDAR NASA NGO NISIMS NMFS NOAA NPFMC NPS NRCS NWHC NYC DEP PBT PFMC PIT QA/QC RLGIS ROMS SAV assessment, inventory, and monitoring Biodiversity Information Serving Our Nation Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Bureau of Recla...
TNC UC USACE USDA USGS The Nature Conservancy University of California U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Geological Survey
Identify and describe some promising potential ecological forecasting products. Support the development of predictive capacity in support of science and society—across a wide range of temporal and spatial scales—within the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Promote a culture of coproduction between the USGS and key U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) Bur...
Natural resource managers make a wide variety of decisions, from site-level decisions that influence management over short time periods and small areas to national-scale decisions with decadal or longer term implications. Because EF may inform many of these decisions, the set of potentially useful forecast products is large. Identifying and priorit...
Who will use the forecast and what decisions will the forecast influence? How will management decisions be improved by production of and access to the forecast? What is the expected cost, in money and time, to operationalize forecast delivery? Is the latency of the data streams needed to drive forecast models short enough to produce timely forecast...
How well understood is the ecological process being forecasted? Are the driving variables, functional forms, and parameters known? How is the forecasted process represented in existing system models that could accelerate forecast develop-ment and also potentially improve the system models themselves? Are rapid improvements in forecast skill anticip...
What is the potential magnitude of improvement in resource management decisions as a result of using the forecast versus using alternative data sources? How will the forecast help manager-researcher partnerships apply adaptive management?
How can the format and structure of the forecast product be structured to integrate into the decision processes of resource managers? How will the forecast be delivered to targeted stakeholders and (or) made available to a broad array of users? What is the relevance of the forecast to the culture of the organizations producing and consuming the for...
[CWD, Chronic Wasting Disease; NGO, nongovernmental organization. Abbreviations of specific organizations: BLM, Bureau of Land Management; BOEM, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management; BOR, Bureau of Reclamation; EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; FS, U.S. Forest Service; FWS, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; NASA, National Aeronautics and Space ...
(3) the need for additional documentation, prioritization, and conversation with agency leadership, and (4) the need for extensive considerations of the research to operations continuum, particularly in a time of flat budgets. Participants noted that the list could help increase awareness of potential applications for EF and that comprehensive scop...
The timing of seasonal events in plants and animals—including migration, seed ripening, egg hatch, and green-up— is relevant to a wide range of management decisions. Anticipating when various life-cycle events will occur can improve planning for such activities as burning, thinning, or chemical control—ensuring that they are conducted when they wil...
Participants were enthusiastic about the future of EF, and closing comments in the workshop included widespread expressions of hope that this workshop is only the beginning of a long-term investment in EF. The list of promising fore-cast products illustrates the breadth and diversity of natural resource management decisions that could be informed b...
Because of the inherently short timeframe and limited participant breadth in a workshop format, the forecast products listed in table 3 should be viewed mainly as examples that illustrate how EF may be used to improve resource management. These examples are not a final, vetted list of the objectively “best” forecast products to be pursued in the fu...
This workshop suggested that EF has potential for improving resource management, but it also identified several substantial obstacles to realizing that potential. By including a diverse group of researchers and managers from within the USGS and its partners, this workshop encompassed a broad suite of perspectives, including researchers who can cont...
The agenda and the responses from the working groups contained in these appendixes are reproduced as submitted by the workshop participants, with only minor editorial changes for clarity and consistency. The abbreviations used are defined in the Abbreviations list in the front of the report. Appendix 1.
Open (Jake Weltzin); Welcome to Fort Collins Science Center (Sharon Taylor) and to the Powell Center (Jill Baron); Logistics (Leah Colasuonno) Workshop goals and structure (Jake)—ELT aspirational charge (Anne Kinsinger) Group Introductions and brief comments about ecological forecasting (John Bradford) Overview of workshop agenda (John) Basics of ...
Review today’s objectives—Confirm report structure and write product descriptions Consider outline for report (John) Writing teams draft descriptions of forecast products and (or) organize matrix for small groups Closing and round robin final comments (Jake) Adjourn
The successful development of any potential forecast product requires an understanding of the proposed application for the product as well as additional information to facilitate prioritization and production of the forecast. The categories of information listed below were developed by the workshop participants and later used by small ad hoc teams ...
During and after the workshop, small teams provided descriptions of each potential forecast product listed in table 2 using the requirements rubric in appendix 2. Given the time constraints, participants were asked to document only the “Evaluation against standardized criteria” portion of the rubric, but some teams completed the entire rubric. Thu...
Short-term forecasts of cyanobacterial blooms and toxins in freshwater lakes
Daily forecasts of cyanobacterial blooms for inland freshwater lakes (near term); daily toxin forecasts and potential assessments of long-term cumulative health effects to inform actionable natural resource management decisions made outside of the USGS.
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
Breakout groups selected information needs and (or) ideas from the workshop brainstorming session (appendix 4) and refined the description as necessary to identify a potential forecast product. Each of these more specific products was then rated as low (L), medium (M), or high (H) on each of the four criteria for assessing the value of ecological f...
- 598KB
- John B. Bradford, Jake Weltzin, Molly Mccormick, Jill Baron, Zack Bowen, Sky Bristol, Daren Carlisle...
- 66
- 2020
Research Ecologist. U.S. Geological Survey. Southwest Biological Science Center. Phone: (928) 523-7766. Email: jbradford@usgs.gov. >>Professional Page.
