Search results
People also ask
What was XIV Zablocki v Redhail?
Is Zablocki v Redhail an AI case?
What happened to Redhail Zablocki?
A Wisconsin statute that prohibited marriage without court approval for people with child support obligations was challenged as unconstitutional. The Court held that the statute violated the Equal Protection Clause and struck it down.
Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U.S. 374 (1978), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that Wisconsin Statutes §§ 245.10 (1), (4), (5) (1973) violated the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause. [1] Section 245.10 required noncustodial parents who were Wisconsin residents attempting to marry inside or outside of Wisconsin to seek a court ...
A 1978 case that challenged a Wisconsin statute denying marriage licenses to delinquent child support payers. The Court ruled 8-1 that the statute violated the Equal Protection Clause and reaffirmed the right to marry as a fundamental right.
A landmark case that struck down a Wisconsin statute that required court permission to marry for parents with unpaid child support obligations. The case analyzed the constitutional rights to marry and equal protection under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses.
Thomas E. ZABLOCKI, Milwaukee County Clerk, etc., Appellant, v. Roger C. REDHAIL, etc. Supreme Court. 434 U.S. 374. 98 S.Ct. 673. 54 L.Ed.2d 618. Thomas E. ZABLOCKI, Milwaukee County Clerk, etc., Appellant, v. Roger C. REDHAIL, etc. No. 76-879. Argued Oct. 4, 1977. Decided Jan. 18, 1978. Syllabus.
A Supreme Court case that challenged a Wisconsin statute that prevented some residents from marrying without a court order. The statute was found to violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Dec 27, 2022 · A landmark case that established the right to marry as a fundamental constitutional right and struck down a Wisconsin law that barred noncustodial parents from marrying unless they paid child support. Learn about the facts, arguments, and outcome of this important family law decision.
