Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. Top results related to examples of imperative programming languages

   • Examples of compiled programming languages with modern features for the real world [please vote for reopen]

     Top Answer

     Answered Aug 18, 2011 · 5 votes

     Haskell.

     Source: http://www.realworldhaskell.org/

     Check all answers on Stack Overflow

     1/5

   • Programming Languages that Make Use of Special Characters

     Top Answer

     Answered Jul 15, 2010 · 7 votes

     Special characters have any place in a modern, non-academic language?

     Yes, but because on most desktops the support for special characters is still awful (bad editors, bad fonts, you name it),

     • You better be planning ten years ahead.
     • You better be very sure there is a good, usable alternative using only ASCII characters.

     I would never advocate a preprocessor: there is too much temptation and room for abuse, and unless it is done very carefully, a preprocessor makes it much harder to write good IDEs and static-analysis tools.

     Some people like a postprocessor, i.e., a prettyprinter, that takes sequences of ASCII characters and renders them as something else. While I have always found this style dreadfully confusing, it is quite popular and successful among some Haskell programmers.

     Other Answers

     Answered Jul 14, 2010 · 4 votes

     In my opinion they have no place in a language, but definitely belong in a default preprocessor. You may get the APL-keyboard problem though. (and possible visual ambiguity).

     A limited example of this as a pre/post processing would be cweaved code.

     Other Answers

     Answered Jul 15, 2010 · 3 votes

     The special characters ← and ⇒ are reserved words in Scala. ← is used for introducing generator bindings whereas ⇒ is used in the function definitions to separate parameter lists from the function body.

     Examples:

     for { word ← List("Hello", "World") character ← word} println(character)-val square = (x: Int) ⇒ x * x-

     It should be noted that Scala compiler also allows the ASCII alternatives of the above symbols (i.e. <- and =>).

     Check all answers on Stack Overflow

     2/5

   • Programming languages that define the problem instead of the solution?

     Top Answer

     Answered Aug 06, 2009 · 31 votes

     What about Declarative Programming? Excerpt from wikipedia article (emphasis added):

     In computer science, declarative programming is a programming paradigm that expresses the logic of a computation without describing its control flow. Many languages applying this style attempt to minimize or eliminate side effects by describing what the program should accomplish, rather than describing how to go about accomplishing it. This is in contrast with imperative programming, which requires an explicitly provided algorithm.

     Other Answers

     Answered Jul 14, 2010 · 4 votes

     In my opinion they have no place in a language, but definitely belong in a default preprocessor. You may get the APL-keyboard problem though. (and possible visual ambiguity).

     A limited example of this as a pre/post processing would be cweaved code.

     Other Answers

     Answered Jul 15, 2010 · 3 votes

     The special characters ← and ⇒ are reserved words in Scala. ← is used for introducing generator bindings whereas ⇒ is used in the function definitions to separate parameter lists from the function body.

     Examples:

     for { word ← List("Hello", "World") character ← word} println(character)-val square = (x: Int) ⇒ x * x-

     It should be noted that Scala compiler also allows the ASCII alternatives of the above symbols (i.e. <- and =>).

     Check all answers on Stack Overflow

     3/5

   • What is difference between functional and imperative programming languages?

     Top Answer

     Answered Aug 22, 2017 · 189 votes

     Definition: An imperative language uses a sequence of statements to determine how to reach a certain goal. These statements are said to change the state of the program as each one is executed in turn.

     Examples: Java is an imperative language. For example, a program can be created to add a series of numbers:

     int total = 0; int number1 = 5; int number2 = 10; int number3 = 15; total = number1 + number2 + number3;

     Each statement changes the state of the program, from assigning values to each variable to the final addition of those values. Using a sequence of five statements the program is explicitly told how to add the numbers 5, 10 and 15 together.

     Functional languages: The functional programming paradigm was explicitly created to support a pure functional approach to problem solving. Functional programming is a form of declarative programming.

     Advantages of Pure Functions: The primary reason to implement functional transformations as pure functions is that pure functions are composable: that is, self-contained and stateless. These characteristics bring a number of benefits, including the following: Increased readability and maintainability. This is because each function is designed to accomplish a specific task given its arguments. The function does not rely on any external state.

     Easier reiterative development. Because the code is easier to refactor, changes to design are often easier to implement. For example, suppose you write a complicated transformation, and then realize that some code is repeated several times in the transformation. If you refactor through a pure method, you can call your pure method at will without worrying about side effects.

     Easier testing and debugging. Because pure functions can more easily be tested in isolation, you can write test code that calls the pure function with typical values, valid edge cases, and invalid edge cases.

     For OOP People or Imperative languages:

     Object-oriented languages are good when you have a fixed set of operations on things and as your code evolves, you primarily add new things. This can be accomplished by adding new classes which implement existing methods and the existing classes are left alone.

     Functional languages are good when you have a fixed set of things and as your code evolves, you primarily add new operations on existing things. This can be accomplished by adding new functions which compute with existing data types and the existing functions are left alone.

     Cons:

     It depends on the user requirements to choose the way of programming, so there is harm only when users don’t choose the proper way.

     When evolution goes the wrong way, you have problems:

     • Adding a new operation to an object-oriented program may require editing many class definitions to add a new method
     • Adding a new kind of thing to a functional program may require editing many function definitions to add a new case.

     Other Answers

     Answered Jul 14, 2010 · 4 votes

     In my opinion they have no place in a language, but definitely belong in a default preprocessor. You may get the APL-keyboard problem though. (and possible visual ambiguity).

     A limited example of this as a pre/post processing would be cweaved code.

     Other Answers

     Answered Jul 15, 2010 · 3 votes

     The special characters ← and ⇒ are reserved words in Scala. ← is used for introducing generator bindings whereas ⇒ is used in the function definitions to separate parameter lists from the function body.

     Examples:

     for { word ← List("Hello", "World") character ← word} println(character)val square = (x: Int) ⇒ x * x

     It should be noted that Scala compiler also allows the ASCII alternatives of the above symbols (i.e. <- and =>).

     Check all answers on Stack Overflow

     4/5

   • Programming languages for distributed system

     Top Answer

     Answered Jul 23, 2010 · 22 votes

     Erlang, as described by Wikipedia:

     It was designed by Ericsson to support distributed, fault-tolerant, soft-real-time, non-stop applications.

     You might also want to read the Distributed Erlang section of their manual.

     However, note that Erlang is a functional language and will require a much different paradigm of thought as compared to C++.

     Check all answers on Stack Overflow

     5/5

   Show moreShow less

2. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Imperative_programmingImperative programming - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Imperative_programming

   • Cached

   In computer science, imperative programming is a programming paradigm of software that uses statements that change a program's state. In much the same way that the imperative mood in natural languages expresses commands, an imperative program consists of commands for the computer to perform. Imperative programming focuses on describing how a ...

3. www.geeksforgeeks.org › what-is-imperative-programmingWhat is Imperative Programming? - GeeksforGeeks

   www.geeksforgeeks.org › what-is-imperative-programming

   • Cached

   Apr 25, 2024 · Imperative programming is the paradigm which is based on providing the result by focusing on the step-by-step command with manipulated state. There are many programming languages which are based on this approach of programming such as C++, python, R and Java. Control flow which exists as the major feature, facilitates the imperative programming.

4. People also ask

   What is imperative programming?

   • Imperative programming focuses on describing how a program operates step by step, rather than on high-level descriptions of its expected results. The term is often used in contrast to declarative programming, which focuses on what the program should accomplish without specifying all the details of how the program should achieve the result.

   Imperative programming - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperative_programming

   See all results for this question

   What is the source code for imperative languages?

   • Therefore, the source code for imperative languages is a series of commands, which specify what the computer has to do – and when – in order to achieve a desired result. Values used in variables are changed at program runtime. To control the commands, control structures such as loops or branches are integrated into the code.

   Imperative programming: Advantages & disadvantages of the paradig…

   www.ionos.com/digitalguide/websites/web-development/imperative-programming/

   See all results for this question

   What are the different imperative programming languages?

   • The different imperative programming languages can, in turn, be assigned to three further subordinate programming styles – structured, procedural, and modular. The structured programming style extends the basic imperative principle with specific control structures: sequences, selection, and iteration.

   Imperative programming: Advantages & disadvantages of the paradig…

   www.ionos.com/digitalguide/websites/web-development/imperative-programming/

   See all results for this question

   What is the difference between imperative and declarative programming?

   • By contrast, in declarative programming, the desired result (what) is described directly. This becomes clearer when using a cooking analogy for illustration: imperative languages provide recipes; declarative languages contribute photos of the finished meal.

   Imperative programming: Advantages & disadvantages of the paradig…

   www.ionos.com/digitalguide/websites/web-development/imperative-programming/

   See all results for this question

5. www.ionos.com › imperative-programmingImperative programming: Advantages & disadvantages of the ...

   www.ionos.com › imperative-programming

   • Cached

   May 21, 2021 · The different imperative programming languages can, in turn, be assigned to three further subordinate programming styles – structured, procedural, and modular. The structured programming style extends the basic imperative principle with specific control structures: sequences, selection, and iteration.

6. www.educative.io › blog › declarative-vs-imperativeDeclarative vs imperative programming: 5 key differences

   www.educative.io › blog › declarative-vs-imperative

   • Cached

   Jul 18, 2022 · In this simple example, imperative instructions dictate what the app should do, when to do it, and how to do it. This pseudocode is comparable to imperative programming, with which you create the logic of the program by making looping statements, calling functions, etc., all in a particular order. Examples of imperative programming languages ...

7. Videos

   • 

     5:16

     youtube.com

     Imperative Programming Paradigm | Programming Paradigm In English | OOPs concepts

     Dec 4, 2018

     7.9K Views

   • 

     8:57

     youtube.com

     Programming paradigms and languages | computer science preparation

     Aug 29, 2021

     35.6K Views

   • 

     34:55

     youtube.com

     "Outperforming Imperative with Pure Functional Languages" by Richard Feldman

     Oct 20, 2021

     85.5K Views

   View all

8. cio-wiki.org › wiki › Imperative_ProgrammingImperative Programming - CIO Wiki

   cio-wiki.org › wiki › Imperative_Programming

   • Cached

   Apr 7, 2024 · Examples of Imperative Programming Languages C: A general-purpose language that offers low-level access to memory and precise control over hardware. Fortran: One of the oldest programming languages, primarily used in scientific and engineering applications.

9. www2.seas.gwu.edu › imperative_languagesImperative Programming Languages (IPL)

   www2.seas.gwu.edu › imperative_languages

   Learn the definitions, characteristics, examples, and history of imperative programming languages, such as FORTRAN, C, Ada, and Simula. Explore the concepts of variables, assignments, procedures, control flow, and side-effects in IPL.

10. www.techtarget.com › searchapparchitecture › tipA brief breakdown of declarative vs. imperative programming

    www.techtarget.com › searchapparchitecture › tip

    Feb 10, 2022 · For imperative programming, the order in which operations occur is crucial; it explicitly outlines the steps that dictate how the program implements desired functionality. Examples of imperative programming languages include C, C++, Java and Fortran. Declarative vs. imperative programming: Technical details