John Cusack
Jackson Curtis
Search results
Nov 11, 2009 · The bottom line is: The movie gives you your money's worth. Is it a masterpiece? No. Is it one of the year's best? No. Does Emmerich hammer it together with his elbows from parts obtained from the Used Disaster Movie Store? Yes. But is it about as good as a movie in this genre can be? Yes. No doubt it will inflame fears about our demise on Dec ...
Parents need to know that director Roland Emmerich's 2012 is an intense, violent disaster movie, with billions of anonymous characters getting killed during massive scenes of destruction (earthquakes, tsunamis, and more). Although the tone is mainly exciting, the relentless devastation could terrify or depress….
- Roland Emmerich
- Jeffrey M. Anderson
- Amanda Peet, Chiwetel Ejiofor, John Cusack
I liked 2012. Whether a movie is good or bad is mostly subjective. I have turned off critically acclaimed movies before as I found them unwatchable (I’m looking at you Dogville (2003). I thoroughly enjoyed “Grandma’s Boy (2006)” and even meet the Star of the film years later and told him I loved the movie.
Everything you’re expecting from 2012 is exactly what you’re going to get…Utterly impossible by any stretch of the imagination, the movie is a cheesy, one-dimensional, epic-sized spectacle that...
Nov 13, 2009 · Roland Emmerich's 2012 provides plenty of visual thrills, but lacks a strong enough script to support its massive scope and inflated length. Earth's billions of inhabitants are unaware that the...
- (246)
- Roland Emmerich
- PG-13
- John Cusack
2012 (I) (2009) User Reviews. Review this title. 1,358 Reviews. Hide Spoilers. Sort by: Filter by Rating: 5/10. This film had so much potential. What went wrong? bennog 11 November 2009. They had all the money, actors and special effects they needed so how did they manage to screw this one up?
People also ask
Is 2012 a good movie?
Why should you watch '2012'?
Why is '2012' so bad?
What's the difference between '2012' and '70s disaster movies?
2012 is littered with characters with no redeeming qualities and a story that, at it’s heart, is a preposterously boring “love at all costs” tale. Anchoring it is John Cusack as Jackson Curtis one of those doom and gloom theorists that lost his family because of his beliefs.
