Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. • • "Equal justice under law" is one of America's most firmly embedded and widely violated legal principles.
     www.scu.edu › ethics › focus-areas

     Equal Justice Under Law - Markkula Center for Applied Ethics

2. People also ask

   Is 'equal justice under law' violated in America?

   • xxxvi. Id. These remarks examine how the legal principle of 'equal justice under law' is widely violated in America. The United States holds the most lawyers, but its legal system is among the least adequate when it comes to equal legal assistance.

   Equal Justice Under Law - Markkula Center for Applied Ethics

   www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/more-focus-areas/resources/equal-justice-under-law/

   See all results for this question

   What does the Supreme Court say about equal justice under law?

   • In the years since moving into their present building, the Supreme Court has often connected the words "equal justice under law" with the Fourteenth Amendment. For example, in the 1958 case of Cooper v. Aaron, the Court said: "The Constitution created a government dedicated to equal justice under law.

   Equal justice under law - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_justice_under_law

   See all results for this question

   Does 'equal law under law' mean justice over law?

   • The phrase may be perceived in a variety of ways, but it very distinctly does not say "equal law under justice", which would have meant that the judiciary can prioritize justice over law. The words "equal justice under law" paraphrase an earlier expression coined in 1891 by the Supreme Court. In the case of Caldwell v.

   Equal justice under law - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_justice_under_law

   See all results for this question

   Are all equal under the law?

   • From the beginning of our nation’s founding, the concept that all are equal under the law and have equal justice under law has been aspirational. But in the late 1890s, with the Supreme Court of the United States’ Fourteenth Amendment jurisprudence, the concept became concrete. Questions remain about whether the concept has been fully fulfilled.

   Principle of Equal Under the Law - Constituting America

   constitutingamerica.org/90day-fp-principle-of-equal-under-the-law-guest-essayist-daniel-a-cotter/

   See all results for this question

3. www.scu.edu › resources › equal-justice-under-lawEqual Justice Under Law - Markkula Center for Applied Ethics

   www.scu.edu › resources › equal-justice-under-law

   • Cached

   "Equal justice under law" is one of America's most firmly embedded and widely violated legal principles. It is a rhetorical flourish commonly encountered in ceremonial rhetoric and occasionally even constitutional decisions. But it comes nowhere close to describing the justice system in practice.

4. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Equal_justice_under_lawEqual justice under law - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Equal_justice_under_law

   • Cached

   Equal justice under law is a phrase engraved on the West Pediment, above the front entrance of the United States Supreme Court building in Washington D.C. It is also a societal ideal that has influenced the American legal system. The phrase was proposed by the building's architects, and then approved by judges of the Court in 1932.

5. equaljusticeunderlaw.org › thejusticereport › 2018Equality and Justice: History and Ideals — Equal Justice ...

   equaljusticeunderlaw.org › thejusticereport › 2018

   • Cached

   Jan 4, 2019 · The phrase “Equal Justice Under Law” traces its origins all the way back to the end of the Peloponnesian War at about 404 B.C.E. At the time, the renowned Greek general Pericles gave a famous speech in which he stated: “If we look to the laws, they afford equal justice to all in their private differences.”.

   • Author: Cynthia Yue

6. constitutioncenter.org › blog › 10-huge-supreme10 Supreme Court cases about the 14th Amendment ...

   constitutioncenter.org › blog › 10-huge-supreme

   • Cached

   • The Slaughter-House Cases (14 Apr 1873) ―In the Slaughter-House Cases, waste products from slaughterhouses located upstream of New Orleans had caused health problems for years by the time Louisiana decided to consolidate the industries into one slaughterhouse located south of the city.
   • Plessy v. Ferguson (18 May 1896) ―The Louisiana legislature had passed a law requiring black and white residents to ride separate, but equal, train cars.
   • Lochner v. New York (17 Apr 1905) ―Lochner, a baker from New York, was convicted of violating the New York Bakeshop Act, which prohibited bakers from working more than 10 hours a day and 60 hours a week.
   • Gitlow v. New York (08 June 1925) ― Before 1925, provisions in the Bill of Rights were not always guaranteed on the local level and usually applied only to the federal government.

7. www.harvardmagazine.com › unequal-justice-americaThe Legal Services Corporation tackles the “justice gap ...

   www.harvardmagazine.com › unequal-justice-america

   • Cached

   That’s the basic measure of the “Justice Gap,” as a recent report by the Legal Services Corporation calls it—the difference between low-income Americans’ need for legal help in dealing with calamitous matters and the resources available to provide it. These are “small claims in the Nation’s eye,” President Richard M. Nixon said ...

8. www.cnn.com › interactive › 2021What 2021 taught us about the fight for racial justice - CNN

   www.cnn.com › interactive › 2021

   • Cached

   Dec 16, 2021 · Images have long been catalysts of change in the struggle for equal justice under law and civil rights in the US, a focus of my scholarship. Photographs of police violence against peaceful ...

9. constitutingamerica.org › 90day-fp-principle-ofPrinciple of Equal Under the Law - Constituting America

   constitutingamerica.org › 90day-fp-principle-of

   • Cached

   Jul 7, 2023 · From the beginning of our nation’s founding, the concept that all are equal under the law and have equal justice under law has been aspirational. But in the late 1890s, with the Supreme Court of the United States’ Fourteenth Amendment jurisprudence, the concept became concrete.