Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Mar 1, 2014 · By 1995 geneticist John Maynard-Smith worried that Gould was givingnon-biologists a largely false picture of evolutionary theory,” whereas journalist Robert Wright plainly asserted Gould was “bad for evolution.” 5 Gould’s fellow evolutionists believed he had opened their theory to general attack.

  2. All this would not matter, were it not that he is giving non-biologists a largely false picture of the state of evolutionary theory." John Maynard Smith was a genuinely great evolutionary biologist, the sort of man that Gould pretended to be. But some readers may have to take my word for this, since the names of eminent scientists are often ...

  3. People also ask

  4. All this would not matter, were it not that he is giving non-biologists a largely false picture of the state of evolutionary biology. Ernst Mayr (2000) Skeptic: You developed your theory of allopatric speciation in the 1940s and 1950s. In the 1970s Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay Gould applied that to the fossil record and called it punctuated ...

  5. this would not matter, were it not that he is giving non-biologists a largely false picture of the state of evolutionary theory. (1995, p. 46) By describing the failure of Gould’s efforts to undermine the modern Darwin-ian synthesis, we can confirm the continuing strength of that synthesis. While

  6. In a review of Daniel Dennett's book Darwin's Dangerous Idea, Maynard Smith wrote that Gould "is giving non-biologists a largely false picture of the state of evolutionary theory." But Maynard Smith was not consistently negative, writing in a review of The Panda's Thumb that "Stephen Gould is the best writer of popular science now active ...

  7. Stephen Jay Gould (September 10, 1941 – May 20, 2002) was an American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and historian of science. He was also one of the most influential and widely read writers of popular science of his generation. He spent most of his career teaching at Harvard University and writing for Natural History, a publication ...

  8. Jan 12, 2000 · All this would not matter, were it not that he is giving non-biologists a largely false picture of the state of evolutionary biology. Expectedly, Gould struck back, referring to Maynard Smith and others of his ilk as “Darwinian fundamentalists,” but obviously the accusations hurt. Nor have they ceased.

  1. People also search for